In Re: Pandurang Venkatesh Malgi

Decided On : Apr-12-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 17(2, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, Section 386, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 88(6A, Section 386, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 88, Section 88, Section 886, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 386, Section 386, Section 386, Section 386

PERSON: Broomfield, GasperI.L.R., Queen-Empress, Queen-Empress, Chhagan Jagannath, Madras, Queen-Empress v. Gasper, I.L., Kandappa, Pleader, Ghhagan Jagannath, Baker, J.3

NORP: J.1, Hindu, Hindu

ORG: P.V. Malgi, Court, Gadag, Gadag, S.V. Malgi, Magistrate, the United Karnatak Insurance Co. Ltd., Magistrate, the Karnatak Company, Magistrate, the Karnatak Company, the Karnatak Company, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Criminal Courts, the High Courts of Calcutta, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Local Government, the Local Government, Court, Magistrate, the Local Government, Magistrate

DATE: February 1, 1932, February 3, 1932, 54, the year 1920, that year, 54, 1894, 1896, 1898, 1894, 1896, 1923, 1898

CARDINAL: 300, 935, 88, 976, 22, 935, 2., an aggrieved third, 2, 1, 976, 2, 1

GPE: Dharwar, Goundan, I.L.R.

ORDINAL: third, third, third