The Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Provinces Vs. Sir S.M. Chitnavis

Decided On : Apr-26-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 66, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 22, Section 30, Section 66, Section 66, Section 66, Section 23 of the Act

PERSON: Russell, Majesty, Shankar Rao Chitnavis, Zinzarde, year.10, Kinkhede, Manual, Latter, Majesty

NORP: J.1, Indian

ORG: the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, Central Provinces, Court, Court, Court, Council, Court, Lordships, Income Tax, inter alia, the High Court, the Court of the Judicial, the Court of the Judicial, Judicial, Court, Lordships, Judicial, Judical, Judicial, Judicial, Lordships, the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, Lordships, the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, Lordships, Lordships, Court, follows:-The, Lordships

CARDINAL: 2, two, Two, one, 74,668, 1,16,480, 1,13,012, 17,983-11-6, 7,481-13-9, 7,481-13-9, 17,983-11-6, 7,481-13-9, 7,481-13-9, 17,982, 7,481, 2, 7,481-13, 7,481-13-9, 17,882, 11, 7,481, 12, 2, two, 7,481-13, 17,982, 10,105, 7,481-13, 13, two, 7,431, 17,982, 7,431-13-9, 17,892, 15, two, 1, 2, 3, 16, 17, 18, 7,481-13, 7,481-13-9, 17,982, 27, 7,481.13-9.28

DATE: 1922, 1908, the year 1926-1927, the year 1925-1926, January 17, 1927, April 25, 1927, the account year, previous years, the account year, years, the account year, the account year, that year, the account year, those years, the previous year, the previous year, the previous year, one year, a year, the account year, December 13, 1928, a year, that year, that year, the account year, the account year, a year, that year, one year, that year, the year, each year, a particular year, that year, one year, an earlier year, the year, the account year, '24, previous years, the year, April 25, 1927

WORK_OF_ART: Can the Income-tax authority

ORDINAL: first, first, first