Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Harikishan and ors. Vs. Krishna Dhanaji Shelki and anr.

Decided On : Sep-25-1975

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Full Bench, Section 36, Section 38, Section 36, Section 39, Section 38, Section 38, Section 84, Section 21, Section 42 or 49A, Section 43, Section 46, Section 84, Chapter III-A, Section 38, Section 49A, Section 21, Section 36, Section 38, Section 52 of the Act, Section 38, Section 38, Section 38, Section 21 of the Act, Section 34, Section 31A, Section 31A, the Bombay Act, Section 38, Section 38, Section 21, Section 38, Section 52 of the Act, Section 38, Section 33B, the Bombay Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 38, Section 38, Article 31A., the Tenancy Act, Section 38, Section 38 of the Act, Section 38 of the Act, Section 38, Section 38, Section 33B, the Bombay Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 33B, Section 33B, Section 33B, the Bombay Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 33B, Section 34, the Bombay Act, Section 39, Section 38, Section 21, Section 88D, the Bombay Act, Order 7, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Tenancy Act, Section 36, Section 38, Section 38, Section 36

NORP: J.1, agrarian

TIME: 9-2-1972, 9-1-1964

CARDINAL: 13-8-1974, 3-10-1961, 38, 2, 1, 2, 3, less than three, 4, 6, three, three, three, three, three, 4, 14, 5, 31-3-1961, 5, more than three, 3, 3, three, three, three, one, 3, two, three, more than three, 4, 3482, 2, one, 3, 3, 14, 5, three, 1974]3SCR101, 39, only one, one third, one, 4, 617, 30-8-1971, 5, 5, 5, 5, three, two, three, 5, 14, 2, 14, 2, 3, 283, one, 943, 785, 16-3-1962, 12, one, Two, 88C, 1975]3SCR958, 2, 16, 2, 13, 2, 12, 3, 3, 4, 3, 1966]3SCR926

DATE: 4-10-1960, 1958, 30-5-1964, 1958, August 1953, 46, 49A, 21, 39, 39A, mind.5, the day, 1958, 12 years, 1958, 14-7-1959, 49A, 1975]3SCR958, the previous day, 1970, 1975]3SCR958, 1958, 1958, 1966, Oct. 1967, 1263, 1961, 1960, 1962, 21

ORG: S, the Bombay Tenancy, Agricultural Lands, the Additional Tahsildar, the Revenue Tribunal, the Bombay Tenancy, Agricultural Lands, State, the Directive Principles of the Constitution, Tillers, Sections 38, the Armed Forces, Sections 41 to 50 of the Act, Godavaribai Jayaram v. Kashiram, sub-sec, Legislature, the Division Bench, the Bombay Enactment, Sections 43, proceedings.14, P. Venkateswarlu v. Motor & General Traders, Lachmeshwar Prasad v., Court, Court, the Division Bench (, Deshmukh, Court, Tillers, Court, Authority, Court, Court, Tillers, Laxman v. Dadarao, the Supreme Court, Rent Control, the High Court, Court, Hariba v. Motibai, Special Civil Applns, Reliance, Rent Act, P. Venkateswarlu v Motor & General Traders, Sections 2, Court, the Supreme Court, above.30

QUANTITY: about 40 acres

PERSON: 7,000/-, Chapters IV, Shri R. R. Deshpande, Shri R. R. Deshpande, Chainani C. J. and, V. S, Kunilal, Bhivsan, Mamlatdar, Keshwar Lal, Hariba, Moti-bai, Shri R. R. Deshpande, Shri Deshpande, Shri Deshpande, Shri Deshpande, Shri Deshpande, Shri Deshpande, Shri R. R. Deshpande, Tiller, Shri Desh, Shri R. R. Deshpande, Shri Chandurkar, Chandurkar J., Gokhale JJ, Madhav Vithoba, Dhondudas, Chandurkar J., Shri Deshpande, Madhav Vithoba's, Shri Deshpande, Madhav Vithoba's, Civil Appln, Kunjilal, Civil Appln, Madhav Vithoba's, Chandurkar J., Ramkrishna, Shri Deshpande, Atmaram Onkar v., Ananda, i. e. Deshpande J., Shri R. N. Deshpande, Shri R. N. Deshpande, Krishna Iyer J., i. e., Shri R. N. Deshpande, Shri Kherdekar, Cls, Cls, Shri Kherdekar, Shri R. R. Deshpande, Nathia Agarwalla v., Jahanara Begum

PRODUCT: the Full Bench

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, Fourthly, Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, third, first, Secondly, first

FAC: Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Tahsildar

GPE: Clause, Clause, Clause, Clauses, India, Shikharchand, Kunjilal, us

LOC: Act.12

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //