The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gomedalli Lakshminarayan

Decided On : Mar-28-1935

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 55, Section 14(1, Section 14, Section 55, Section 3 of the Act, Section 2(0, Section 14(1

PERSON: John Beaumont, Raised, Lort-Williams, Madras, Lort-Williams, Jack JJ, Rangnekar, J.6, Mayne, Dinshah Mulla, Vedathanni, Madras

GPE: Kt., Moolji Sicka

ORG: the Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 66(2, Calcutta, the Advocate General, the Madras High Court, Veda, the Advocate General, the Calcutta High Court, apratibandha daya, Crown, Crown, Advocate General, the Calcutta High Court

NORP: Indian, Hindu, Hindu, Indian, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Indian, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

ORDINAL: first, first, second

CARDINAL: 1922.2, one, two, one, one, one, 1, five, 6, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, two, 344, 347, 230, three, only one, two, 56, 1

DATE: 1929, the year, 55, December 13, 1934

WORK_OF_ART: Principles of Hindu Law