Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Abdul HuseIn Mohammedally Master Vs. Union of India and Others

Decided On : Sep-07-1981

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Partnership Act, Section 124, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 112, Section 111 of the Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.4

CARDINAL: 1, two, one, 1/4, 16/26, 8, 17/55, 2, 5(3)(iii, 5, 3, 1, 3, 3)(iii, 5, three, three, three, three

DATE: 1932, November 26, 1971, the year 1971-72, February 16, 1972, January 28, 1972, February 14, 1972, February 16, 1972, February 18, 1972, early May 1972, May 12, 1972, June 19, 1972, 1962, July 28, 1972, October 3, 1972, February 27, 1976, September 5, 1977, 1955, a period of, two weeks, today

ORG: Simco Industries, the Import Policy for, Simco Industries, Hongkong, Ebrahim Enterprises, Bombay Docks, Customs, inter alia, the Import (Control) Order No, inter alia, the Import (Control) Order, the Appellate Collector of Customs, the Government of India, the Imports (Control) Order, inter alia, C.I.F., Clause 5 of Import (Control) Order, Clause 5, the Import (Control) Order

GPE: India, Bombay, S.S., Japan, U.K., U.S.A.

PERSON: Ebrahim Enterprises, Ebrahim Enterprises, Shri Hidayatullah, Shri Hidayatullah

QUANTITY: 5 tonnes, 550/- per ton, 10,550/- per metric tonne, 12,800/- per metric tonne, 20,000/- per metric tonne

EVENT: Clause 5

ORDINAL: second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //