Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. Vs. Basumati Private Ltd.

Decided On : Dec-07-1967

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Notice of Motion, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Notice of Motion, the Notice of Motion of the Plaintiffs, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10, Section 10, Section 3, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 3, the Indian Limitation Act, Order IV, Rule 2, the Indian Limitation Act, the Explanation to Section 3, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 3, the Indian Limitation Act, Order VII, Section 149 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10 of the Code, Section 10, Section 10, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 122, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 10 of the Code, S. 10

PERSON: K.K. Desai, J.1, Justice Mody, P. M. Rajgopalan, Justice Mody, P. M. Rajagopalan, Diwan, Ramgopal, B. L. R. 84, Chandra, Chandra, Heerendranath Datta, Nariman, Blackwell, J., C. J., Nariman, Nariman, Justice Blackwell, Justice Blackwell, Diwan, Diwan, Nariman, Diwan, Order XXXVII, Sennaji Kapurchand v., Pannaji Devichand, Order XXXVI l, Nariman, Order XXXVII, Order XXXVII, Krishnanath Balkrishna, Ram Ratan, Jagannath Murlidhar V. Rupchand, Order XXXVII Rule, Tendolkar J., Pestonji v. Jamshedji :, O. XXXVII, O. XXXVII R. 3, Order XXXVII, Order XXXVII, Nariman, Ramrichpal Singh v. Dayanand Sarup, Civil P. C., Diwan, Diwan, Diwan, Diwan, P. M. Rajagopalan, Diwan, Nariman, Asrumati Debi v., Kumar Rupendra Deb, Sondhi Sons, Ramnarayana Poddar, Sriramchandra v. Mahalakshmamma AIR, Diwan, Jivanlal, Pirojshaw, Jai Hind Iron Mart, J., C. J., C. J., Shorab Modi

DATE: March 30, 1966, February 11, 1966, No.4 of 1966, 1965, March 1963, August 1964, May 30, 1963, June 15, October 29, December 31, 1964, December 11, 1964, March 1965, March 29, 1965, August 12, 1965, December 16, December 1965, 1965, February 11, 1966, February 10, 1966, February 5, 1966, March 8, 1966, March 30, January 10, 1966, February 5, 1966, December 23, 1965, 20th December 1965, the same day, January 1966, 23rd December 1965, December 23, 1965, 1965, 23rd December 1965.'As, December 24, 1965, the 24th of December 1965, December 24, 1965, one day earlier, December 20, 1965, August 16, 1966, December 20, 1965, December 22, 1934 Bom 91, 1940, 1935, January 10, December 20, 1965, January 10, 1966, December 20, 1965, December 22, 1965, December 24, 1965, that day, the 24th of December 1965, December 20, between December 20 and 24, December 24, December 24, 1965, December 24, December 24, January 10, 1966, December 24, 1965, that day, December 22, January 10, 1966, December 24, 1965, December 24, 1965, December 24, May 25, 1932, 1940, December 20, 1965, December 20, 1965, 1934 Bom 91, 1954, 1954, the 24th of December 1965', December, December 24, 1985, December 24, that very day, December 20, December 24, 1965, December 20, 1965, December 24, 1965, December 24, 1965, December 24, 1965, 1903, 1966, 1966, 1925, 1966, September 5, 1966, 1957, 1966, one day

ORG: Notice of Motion, the High Court, the Notice of Motion, Hoe Rotary Printing Machine, Inter-Type Machines, Suit, Court, Suit, the High Court, Calcutta, Calcutta, Notice of Motion, Calcutta, the Notices of Motion, DilipSen Gupta, the High Court of Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, the High Court of Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Inter-Type Machines, Calcutta, Court, Calcutta, Court, Calcutta, Court, Calcutta, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Special Leave to Appeal Petition No.736 of 1966, The Supreme Court, Court, The Plaintiffs, Court, Court, Order VI Rule l of the Code of Civil Procedure, AIR, the High Court at Calcutta, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Suit, the Privy Council, Weld & Co., Dharamsi Chemical Co., Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, valorem Court, the High Court, Court, valorem Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Attorneys, Rules 104, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Notice of Motion, Court, Symon and Co. v., Palmer's Stores, KB 259, Dewanchand, ILR, AIR 1922 Bom 276, Notice of Motion, Notice of Motion, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court at Allahabad, AIR l, Notice of Motion, Court, Court, Inter-Type Machines, the Hoe Rotary Printing Machine, defendants.18, Elphinstone Etc, Court, Shantiniketan Co-operative, Housing Society Ltd., the High Court, AP, Calcutta, Calcutta, Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Letters Patent, the High Court of Calcutta, the Division Bench, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Calcutta, Court, Calcutta

CARDINAL: 2270, two, 5000/, 2,50,000, 2,50,000, three, 2,000, three, 5,000, 582, 2,000, 1,00,000, 582, 1965.4, 2270, 1966.5, 2, 0, 2, 12, 22, 24, 10-1-1966, 10, 2270, 5,000, three, 582, two, two, 2, 3, 5,000, 582, 10, 1 965, 44, 604, two, two, 29, 480, 36, 40, 1965.11, 36, 91 one, 12, 604, 36, 36, 36, 100 to 105, 100, 8, 102, 103, 105, 36, 91, 105, 105, 40, 1912)1, 46, 431, 68, 1954)56BOMLR916, 3, 68, 3, 955, 309, two, 5,000, 582, 5,000, three, 582, two, 2,50,000, two, 736, 100,000

MONEY: 71/2 per cent, 71/2 per cent

PERCENT: 71/2 %

GPE: Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Beaumont, Suprokash, Raisuddin v., Basti, Diwanchand, Beaumont, Malik, Beaumont, Chagla, Bombay

PRODUCT: Rupees 1,92,684.72, Calcutta Suit, Calcutta, Clause l 2, LR 981, Bom LR 84, Bom LR 84=, Bom LR 84, Bom LR 84, Bom LR 84, Rule 104, Bom LR 84, Calcutta, 491

EVENT: Clause 15, Clause 15, Clause 15

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, second, second, third, first

TIME: 3 p.m.', 3 p.m., 3 p.m.', next morning, 3 p.m.

FAC: Sections 5, Sections 5

NORP: Rules 104, Rules 104, Central Brokers

LOC: suit.15, Madras, Madras