Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Krishnaji Shivaji Pawar Vs. Hanmaraddi Mallaraddi Maidur
Decided On : Feb-22-1934
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Order I, Rule 10, Section 22, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 22, the Indian Limitation Act
PERSON: John Beaumont, Nilkant Atmaram, Nilkant Atmaram, Nilkant Atmaram, Cumar Ganoda Kant, Roy Bahadur I.L.R, Pirbhai Virji I.L.R(1897, Vaithinatha Iyer, Mahadev I.L.R(1897, Nilkant Atmaram, Justice Ranade, Subodini Debi, Cumar Ganoda Kant, Roy Bahadur, Nilkant Atmaram, Brojo Lal Saha Banikya v. Budh Nath Pyarilal & Co., I.L.R, Brojo Lal Saha Banikya v. Budh Nath Pyarilal & Co., Gura Mia Chaudhuri I.L.R(1930, Brojo Lal Saha Banikya v. Budh Nath Pyarilal & Co.6, Barlee, J.8, Mayne, Nilkant Atmaram, Mayne
GPE: Kt., Dharwar, Subordinate, Subordinate, Subodini Debi, Fatmabai, Subbaraya Iyer, Harkishore, Barna
ORG: Nazir, the Court of the First Class Joint Subordinate, Subordinate, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, View, Court, the Madras High Court, Court, Ravji, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Court, Court
DATE: the year 1919, 1924, the year 1924, 1933, 1919, June, 1922, 1887, the same year, 1927
CARDINAL: two, one, 1, 400, one, 21, 580, 115, 22, 672, 551, 752, 603, 603
WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate, Subordinate
ORDINAL: first