Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Krishnaji Shivaji Pawar Vs. Hanmaraddi Mallaraddi Maidur

Decided On : Feb-22-1934

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Order I, Rule 10, Section 22, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 22, the Indian Limitation Act

PERSON: John Beaumont, Nilkant Atmaram, Nilkant Atmaram, Nilkant Atmaram, Cumar Ganoda Kant, Roy Bahadur I.L.R, Pirbhai Virji I.L.R(1897, Vaithinatha Iyer, Mahadev I.L.R(1897, Nilkant Atmaram, Justice Ranade, Subodini Debi, Cumar Ganoda Kant, Roy Bahadur, Nilkant Atmaram, Brojo Lal Saha Banikya v. Budh Nath Pyarilal & Co., I.L.R, Brojo Lal Saha Banikya v. Budh Nath Pyarilal & Co., Gura Mia Chaudhuri I.L.R(1930, Brojo Lal Saha Banikya v. Budh Nath Pyarilal & Co.6, Barlee, J.8, Mayne, Nilkant Atmaram, Mayne

GPE: Kt., Dharwar, Subordinate, Subordinate, Subodini Debi, Fatmabai, Subbaraya Iyer, Harkishore, Barna

ORG: Nazir, the Court of the First Class Joint Subordinate, Subordinate, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, View, Court, the Madras High Court, Court, Ravji, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Court, Court

DATE: the year 1919, 1924, the year 1924, 1933, 1919, June, 1922, 1887, the same year, 1927

CARDINAL: two, one, 1, 400, one, 21, 580, 115, 22, 672, 551, 752, 603, 603

WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate, Subordinate

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //