Pradyut Natwarlal Shah Vs. Suryakant N. Sangani and ors.

Decided On : Apr-25-1978

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 60, the First Respondent, Article 111 of the Constitution of India the, Section 65, Section 65, Section 65, Section 64 of the Code of CivilProcedure, Section 64, Section 65, Section 64, Cal 177, Section 60, Section 64, Section 60 of the Code, Article 141 of the Constitution the

CARDINAL: 1, 103, 1908.2, 20,041, 17,060, two, 8639, 54, 9, 41, one, 796, 103, 24,000, one, 1973.4, 35,000, 35,000, 1,500, two, 97, 103, two, 1967]2SCR77, 102, 14, 742, 60, 14, only one, 39, 400, two, one, 1 and 3, 1, 9, 41, 411, 440, flat.18, 1981.19

ORG: the Bombay City Civil Court, the Bombay City Civil Court, the Third Respondent, Suit, the Third Respondent, the Third Respondent, Paresh Co-operative, Housing Society Limited, the Third Respondent, the Third Respondent's, Court, Civil Revision Application No, Court, the City Civil Court, the City Civil Court, Court, Court, Suit No, the Sheriff of Bombay, Court, the City Civil Court, Letters Patent Appeal, Letters Patent Appeal a Division Bench, Mukhi, Maharashtra Co, Court, Letters Patent Appeal, Letters Patent Appeal, the City Civil Court, the Supreme Court, Civil Appeal No, the First Respondent, the Supreme Court, the First Respondent, the Supreme Court, the First Respondent, the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Judgment the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Appellant, the Supreme Court, Review Petition No., the First Respondent, the Supreme Court, Society, Court, the City Civil Court, the First Respondent, Court, the City Court, Suit No, the City Civil Court, High Courts, the Supreme Court, Lordships, Their Lordships of, the Supreme Court, the CityCivil Court, the City Civil Court, the Supreme Court, the First Respondent, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Purchaser, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Lahore High Court, purchaser, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, revision.10, High Courts, Court, the Calcutta High Court, AIR, the Calcutta High Court, the Madras High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the High Courts, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, ILR, the Allahabad High Court, the High Court, Suffice, ILR, this High Court, the First Respondent, the First Respondent, Lordships of the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the First Respondent, Housing Society Limited, the First Respondent, Court, the First Respondent, the City Civil Court, High Courts, the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the First Respondent, Respondents, the Supreme Court, Their Lordships of, the Supreme Court, the City Civil Court, the Supreme Court, this Review Petition, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the First Respondent, Court, the First Respondent the Appellant, the First Respondent, Appeal, Court, the Appellant of Flat No, Paresh Co-operative, Housing Society Limited, the First Respondent, Court, Court, the First Respondent, Court, the First Respondent, Bombay City Civil Court Suit

PERSON: Order XXI, Order XXI, Bombay-54, Ratilal Chande, Shashikala, Hasmukh, Hasmukh, Hasmukh, Shashikala, Shashikala, Shashikala, Hasmukh, Order XXI, Vaidya, J., Vaidya, J., Vaidya, Jadhavji Joshi v., Vaidya, Bhole, Jadhavji Joshi, Hasmukh, Shashikala, Jadhavji Joshi, Order XXI, S.R. Shah, Order XXI, Suresh, Zaiwalla, Zaiwalla, Janak Raj v. Gurdial Singh, Zaiwalla, Zaiwalla, Zaiwalla, Sham Singh, Vir Bhan, Zaiwalla, Zaiwalla, Zaiwalla, Zaiwalla, Zaiwalla, Annapuma Patrani, Lakshmana Kara, Koer, Chandra Gangopadhyaya, Order XXI, Order XXI, Patringa Koer, Najimunnessa Bibi v. Nacharaddin Sardar, Sushila Bala Dasi, Guest, Keen Williams, Gopal Prasad v. Kashinath, Thakar v. Kashi Bai ILR, Mahuvakar, Mahuvakar, Jadhavji Joshi, Hasmukh, Shashikala, Civil P. C., Mahuvakar, Paresh Co-operative, Hiralal Shah, Shah, Jadhavji Joshi, Respondents Nos, overlooks, Bombay-54, Nos

DATE: 1969, 1969, March 31, 1970, Aug. 8, 1970, Sept. 11, 1970, Nov. 27, 1970, 1970, Sept. 30, 1971, Nov. 25, 1971, March 1, 1972, Feb. 14, 1972, Feb. 28, 1972, 1972, March 1, 1972, March 15, 1972, March 28, 1972, April 24, 1972, 1908, 1960, November 2, December 21, 1972, Sept. 30, 1971, Jan. 11, 1973, 1974, Jan. 22, 1974, the end of April 1974, May 1, 1974, the same day, May 15, 1974, 1960, Nov. 26, 1975, Dec. 24, 1975, March 6, 1976, March 11, 1970, March 17, 1976 the Appellant, Sept. 30, 1976, November 8, 1976, 1976, Feb. 28, 1977, March 1, 1972, Dec. 24, 1975, 1911, 1911, 1949, 1920, 1886, 1859, April 14, 1976, December 31, 1981, December 31, 1981, March 6, 1976, Dec. 31, 1976

PRODUCT: the Second Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, a Full Bench, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

ORDINAL: first, first, First, Secondly, first, second, first, third, second, first

GPE: Podar Road, Santa Cruz, Hasmukh, Bhupendra, Hasmukh, India, India, Counsel, Counsel, Patringa, Pratap, Rankin, Lalu, decree.12, India, Santa Crux

FAC: Sheriff, Appellant, Judgment, Podar Road

WORK_OF_ART: the Second Respondent, 'Ramesh Himmatlal Shah v., Ramesh Himmatlal Shah v., the Warrant of Possession

EVENT: the First Respondent

NORP: Bharat