Hanil Era Textiles Ltd., a Limited Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Through General Manager, West Zone, Purchase Dept. and ors.

Decided On : Feb-21-2006

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Bombay Prohibition Act, Constitution, the State Prohibition Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act, Article 136 of the Constitution, the Bombay Prohibition Act, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 12 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Constitution, the Bombay Prohibition Act

PERSON: D.Y. Chandrachud, Anhydrous Ethanol, Taluka Khalapur, Anhydrous Ethanol, Motor Gasoline, Organo-metallic Compounds.-3, Petitioner, Petitioner, Petitioner, B.N. Thorat, Thorat, Petitioner, Thorat, S.S. Lele, Lele, Lele, Lele, Lele, Denatured Ethanol, Ethanol, Lele, Denatured Ethanol

NORP: J.1, Turpentine, Ketones, Maharashtra

ORG: Respondents, Court, Respondents, the State Excise Authorities, Court, Ethanol, Ethanol, State Excise, Ethanol, Court, Court, Maharashtra inter, Ethanol, the Supreme Court, Bihar Distillery v. Union of India, Vam Organic Chemicals, U.P., Respondents, Ethanol, the State of Maharashtra, Court, the State of Maharashtra, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Special Leave Petition, the State of Maharashtra, State, the High Court, the First Respondent, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Ethanol, Ethanol, Ethanol, Ethanol, Pyrroles, Methanol, Ethanol, Ethanol, State Excise, State, Ethanol, Petitioners, the State Excise Authorities, the First Respondent, the State Excise Authorities, Court, Ethanol, the State Excise Department, the State Excise Authorities, the First Respondent, State Excise Authorities, the First Respondent, Petitioners, Petitioners, the Central Excise Authorities ', Petitioners, Court, the State Excise Authorities, Petitioners, Ethanol, Respondents, Respondents, Court, the Supreme Court, the Special Leave Petition, Court, State, Respondents, Committee, the Oil Industry, the State Excise Authorities, Respondents, Ethanol, the State Excise Authorities, Petitioners, the State Excise Authorities, Court, Respondents, the Chemical Composition, Petitioners, Court, Respondents, Petitioners, SDS, SDS, Ethanol, Respondents, the State Excise Authorities, Respondents, the Industry Manual on Operation Quality and Safety, Ethanol, Ethanol, SDS, Respondents, the Chemical Engineering Department, the Institute of Chemical Technology, the University of Mumbai, SDS, crotonaldehyde, SDS, SDS, The State of Maharashtra, Court, Biochemical Engineering, Food Engineering & Technology Department, Institute of Chemical Technology, SDS, SDS, Respondents, Court, Respondents, Court, the Government of India, Court, Courts, Courts, Tata Cellular v. Union of India : AIR1996SC11, the State Excise Authorities, State, Respondents, Ethanol, Petitioners, SDS, Petitioners, Petitioners, Court, the Institute of Chemical Technology, the University of Mumbai, SDS, Court, the State Government, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, Court, Petitioners, the State Government

GPE: Counsel, Counsel, Vanivali, District Raigad, IS-15464, Gujarat, Crotonaldehyde, Brucine, crotonaldehyde, Mumbai

CARDINAL: 2, 1997]1SCR680, 1997]1SCR403, 8, 6., 9, 52, 37, 15, 20, 8., 9, 10, 99.6.%, two, two, 12, 14, two, 15, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, one, 14, 15, 16

DATE: 2005, 1949, 17th February 2003, 1549 of 2004, 20th April 2004, 9th July 2004, 1949, 20th April 2004, 21st February 2005, three months, 4117, 8th February 7 2005, 1st September 2005, 15th September 2005, October 2005, October 2005, 1949, 21st February 2005, September 2005, 23rd August 2005, 21st October 2005, 28th October 2005, November 2005, 13th January 2006, February 2006, 14th December 2005, February 2006, 1949

PERCENT: 99.6%, 99.6%, 99.6%, 99.6%, 95%, 99.6%, 99.6%, about 95%, 1%, 95%, 5%, 5%, 99.6%, 99.6%

QUANTITY: 15.6 degree C/15.6 degree C, 104 degree

ORDINAL: first, 5th, 7th, 15th, 14th, third, 6th

PRODUCT: the Oil Companies

WORK_OF_ART: the Specially Denatured Spirit

EVENT: Wednesbury

FAC: Constitutional