Semantic Analysis by spaCy
ishwarlal Hiralal Gunderia Vs. Union of India and Others
Decided On : Apr-19-1989
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 3(1, the COFEPOSA Act', Article 226(1, Article 226(2, Article 226, Section 41, the Bombay Reorganisation Act, Chapter XXXI, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226, Constitution, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 by the Fifteenth Amendment, Article 226(1, the Amending Act, Article 226, Section 41, the Bombay Reorganization Act, Article 226, the Code of Civil Procedure nor, Constitution, Article 226 We
PERSON: V.A. Mohta, Ishwarlal Gunderia, District Buldana, Haren Choksey, Nos, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur Bench, Buldana, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur, Saka Venkata Rao, Bill, Khajoor Singh, Saka Venkata Rao, Bill, Cook, Gill
NORP: J.1, Joint
GPE: Khamgaon, Bombay, India, New Delhi, Vidarbha, Bombay, Bombay, Cochin, Delhi, New Delhi, Khamgaon, Vidarbha Region, Vidarbha Region, Bombay, India, States, Delhi, Govt, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay
ORG: the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Detaining Authority, Bombay High Court, Nitin Industrial Association, the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, Nagpur Bench, the High Court, Supreme Court, Election Commission, AIR 1958, SC, These Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Courts, the High Court, Nitin Industrial Association, Punjab High Court, Central Capital Government, High Courts, Bench, the Supreme Court, the Appellate Side Rules, Nitin Industrial Association, Court, COFEPOSA, Registrar
DATE: 1974, 30th January, 1989, 3rd February, 1989, 1st March, 1989, 3rd March, 1989, 17th April, 1989, about six weeks, 1960, 1960, 25-9-1984, 1957, 1963, 1957, 1873, 1989
CARDINAL: 1 to 3, 4, two, 956, 2, two, 213, 986, 987
FAC: Bombay Jail
ORDINAL: first
PRODUCT: LR 8 CP 107, Bench