Shaikh Yakub Harunkhan Vs. Mahadev Narayan Prabhu Desai

Decided On : Feb-04-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Rule 22, Rule 22, Cal 96, Rule 22, a Divisional Bench, Rule 22

PERSON: Rangnekar, J.1, Desai, Order XXI, Order XXI, Order XXI.2, Manmatha Nath Ghose v., Lachmi Debi, Rajagopala Ayyar v. Mama-nujachariar, Manmatha Nath Ghose v., Lachmi Debi, Rajagopala Ayyar v. Ramanujaehariar, Order XXI, Order XXI, Viswanatkan Ghetty v., Somasundaram Chetty, Satinath Banarjee, Viswanathan Ghetty v., Somasundaram Chetty, Cal, Somasundarara Chetty, Order XXI, Order XXI, Ramesam J., Waller, J., Ramesam J., Order XXI, Oldfield, Chetty v. Somasundaram Chetty, Order XXI

DATE: more than one year old, March 1926, March 1928, January 1929, 1927, 1923, 1921, 1916, 1921, 1914, 72

CARDINAL: 2, 1, 22, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 22, 1, 875, 294):-We, 954, 875, 2, 2, 2, 302, 1, 8), 1, 6, half, 307, one, three, 305, 22, 8, three, 1, 2, 1, 2, two, 2, 2, 2

GPE: I.L.R., Viswnnathan, Viawanathan, Viswanathan, Viswanaihan, Viswanathan, Viswanathan

ORG: Court, Court, Schwabe C.J., Schwabe C.J., Shyam Mandal, Court, Privy Council, Das, Viswanaihan Chetty v., Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Viswanathan Chetty v. Somasnildaram Chetly, Court, Court

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, the Fall Bench

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second