Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sanco Plastics Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce

Decided On : Nov-14-2003

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: the Test Report of the Shriram Institute for Industrial Research, Section 11A(1, Order No.

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 60 to 85, 17.1.2000, 17.1.2000, 24.3.2000, 70, 80, 579, 68, 68, 17, three, 18.3.99, 12.3.99, 16.2.99, 21.4.99, 40-70, 15.5.2002, 1/2002, 7.3.2000, 11,606

ORG: Modvat Credit, Shri K.L. Rekhi, Appeal, M/s. Sanco Plastic Pvt. Ltd., PVC, the Central Revenue Control Laboratory, Credit, PVC Compound, PVC, CRCL, the Department of Telecommunications, PVC, PVC, Reliance, Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd., UOI, ELT, the Supreme Court, M/s. Tayaji &amp, Sons Pvt. Ltd., Shri K.L. Rekhi, PVC, Tayaji &amp, Sons, Appellants, Appellants, PVC, Shri Mahesh, M/s, Shriram Vinyl &, Chemical Industries, PVC, PVC, M/s. M.C.I.(India, M/s. Vikas Industries, Shri K.L. Rekhi, PVC, Tribunal, Phosphate Co. Ltd, CCE, Sar Polymers Pvt.Ltd., PVC, PVC Emulsion, DOP, DBP, Cable Compounding PVC Emulsion, the Department of Industries, Quality Marking Centre For Electrical Goods, PVC, ISI, Tensile Strength, Elongation, Hardness, Shri Prag Jain of Wardhman Cables, PVC, Shri Parasaran Bhutarial, PVC, Godrej Foods Ltd., UOI, Collector, Reliance, Batliboi and Company Ltd., CCE, ELT 460, India Tin Industries, CCE, ELT 731, Department, Appellant, Department, Appeals, M/s. Vinica Plastic Pvt.Ltd., Shri Virendra Vashist, M/s. Vinica Plastic Pvt. Ltd., Modvat Credit, PVC, PVC, PVC, PVC, Manish Kumar Jain, SDR, PVC, P) Ltd., PVC, P) Ltd., PVC, Chemical Industries, PVC, PVC, M/s. Chemplast Samnae Ltd., SDR, PVC, Shri Mahesh, Shriram Vinyl &amp, Chemical Industries Ltd., PVC, PVC, PVC, the Adjudicating Authorities, PVC, PVC, PVC, PVC, SDR, Appellants, Advocate, Affidavit, CCE, CCE, PVC, PVC, Plastic Engineering, PVC, PVC, Appellants, PVC, Affidavit, Finolex Industries Ltd., K. Value Emulsion Resin, PVC, PVC, Appellants the Revenue, Appellants, PVC, the Adjudicating Authority, Telecommunication, Quality Assurance, The Supreme Court, Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd., Union of India, ELT, Appellants

PERSON: Resin, Resin, Resin, Resin, Resin, K.K. Anand, Calcutta II, ELT, Shri M.R. Sablok, Haryana Govt, Resin, Surat, Bangalore, Shri Manish, Kumar Jain, Virendra Vashisth, Charul Baranwal, Shri P.M. Rao, Shri Parag Jain, Cables Ind., Kumar Bhutaria, Shri A. Guha, Shri Mahesh, Appellants, Modvat Credit, Shri K.K. Anand, Shri M.R. Sablok, Shri Sablok, Affidavit, Shri M.R. Sablok, Malhotra, Technologist, Appellants, Appellants, Resin, Appellants, Order

PRODUCT: Consultant, Consultant, the RT-12 Return, J172, Consultant, Consultant, Grade, RT-12, J172

MONEY: 42.60 per cent, 43.9 per cent, 55 per cent

PERCENT: 52.5%, only 55%, only 55%, 76.3%, 43.9%, 70%, between 40% to 70%, 55%, 70 percent, up to 80%, only 55%, only 55%, 40%, around 60%, 80-90%, up to 70%, 40% to 70%, up to 80%, 70%, 55%

DATE: 12.4.2001, 1978, 1995-96, 1998-99, 1996, 1995, 13176-1991, 1944, 1993, 44, 1993, 28, 2000, 2000, 1994, 70, 20.10.1992, two decades, March 2000, 1978

NORP: RG1

EVENT: RT 12

GPE: Emul Paste, Proviso, DR, Delhi, Affidavit, CRCL, New Delhi

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Prasan

LOC: Central Excise duty.10

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //