Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. S.B. Gopalakrishna

Decided On : Nov-12-2003

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

LAW: the Finance Act, Section 65(48)(g, the Wealth Tax Act, the Finance Act, the Wealth Tax Act, Section 65(11, Section 65(48)(g, the Finance Act, Section 65(48(g, the Finance Act, Section 65(11, Section 65(48)(g, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Section 65(48)(g, the Finance Act, the Finance Act

CARDINAL: 1, 28, 8, 8, more than one, 4, 131, 14, 65(41)(g, 65(48)(g, 17, 17, ten, 6,926/-respectively, 5,000/-

PERSON: Order, Shri L. Narasimha Murthy, Shri L. Narasimha Murthy, V. Shanmughavel, Shri Aswathanarayana, Chartered Accountant, Madras, Order

ORG: Central Excise &, Customs (Appeals, Consulting, JDR, the Commissioner (Appeals, Consulting Engineer, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Institution of Valuers, Engineer, Consulting Engineer, Architect, Central Excise, Chennai, ELT, Counsel, the Commissioner (Appeals, Engineer, the High Court, Engineer, the Madras High Court, The Supreme Court, Department

DATE: 1994, 1994, 2001, 1994, 1994, 1994, 12th November, 2003

PRODUCT: Valuers, Appellant

ORDINAL: first

GPE: terms.8

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //