Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ramchandra Natha Vs. the Great Indian Peninsula Railway

Decided On : Mar-05-1915

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 72, the Indian Contract Act, Section 72, Section 47, Section 72.6, Section 47, Section 72, Section 47, Section 72, the Indian Railways Act, Section 72, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 6 of Act XV, the Indian Contract Act, Section 72, Section 72, Section 72, Section 72, Section 72, Section 47, Section 72, Section 72, Section 72, Section 72, Section 72, Section 72, Section 72 of the Act, Section 72, Rule 2 under Section 47

ORG: Heaton, the Railway Company's, the Court of Small Causes, Court, Court, Railway, Court, Legislature, Court, Shah, the Full Court, Company, Court, Court, Company, the Full Court, Company, the Indian Railways Act, Company, Council, Company, Company, Council, Company, Company, Company, State

NORP: J.1

LOC: the Great Indian Peninsula Railway Company

GPE: Bombay, India, Council, I.L.R.

PRODUCT: the Full Bench

CARDINAL: 152, 161, 1872.4, 2, 1, 24, c. 104.13, 151, 152, 161, 2, 1, 2, 367, 1

ORDINAL: secondly, first

PERSON: J.10, Act.14, Binning, Banna Mal v.

DATE: 1882, question.15, 1901

FAC: the Governor-General

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //