Radheshaym Mohanlal Kaitan Vs. the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Nagpur and ors.

Decided On : Apr-01-1969

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 145, Section 146, Section 145, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 36, Agricultural Lands Act, Section 145, Section 120, the Tenancy Act, Section 120 of the Act, Section 36 of the Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 145, Section 36, Section 145, Section 36, Section 129, Section 36, Section 120, the Tenancy Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 120 of the Act, Section 38, Section 14 of the Limitation Act, Section 36, Section 145, Section 145, Section 36, Section 36, Section 145, Section 14, Section 29, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 38, Section 36, Section 36, Section 36, Section 145, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 29, the Limitation Act, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 29, Section 4, Section 22, the Limitation Act, Section 38, the Tenancy Act, Section 29, the Limitation Act, Section 3, Section 4, Section 22, Section 29, Section 14, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 29, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 417(3, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 29, Section 29, the Limitation Act, Section 417(3, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 29, Section 3 of the Limitation Act, Section 3, the Limitation Act, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 29, the Limitation Act, Section 29, Section 4, Section 22, Section 30, the Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 29, the Limitation Act, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 29, the Limitation Act, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 9, the Limitation Act, Section 9, the Limitation Act, Section 9, the Limitation Act, Section 86, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 145, Section 36, the Limitation Act Section 14, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 145, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 145, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 36, the Tenancy Act, Section 36 of the Act, Section 129, the Tenancy Act, Section 129, Section 2, Chapter II, Sections 21, Section 91, Section 129, Chapter II, Section 2, Chapter II, Chapter and Section 91, Section 36, Chapter II, Section 36, the Chapter II, Chapter II, Section 129, Section 36, Section 36, Section 36 of the Act, Section 145, Section 120, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 120, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 36, Section 120, the Tenancy Act, Section 120, the Tenancy Act, Section 120, Section 36(1, Section 36(1, the Tenancy Act

ORG: ORDER1, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Civil Court, the S. D. M., the Bombay Tenancy, the Court of the Collector, Nagpur District, the Court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Court of the Naib Tahsildar, the Additional Tahsildar, the Bombay Tenancy Act, Criminal Court's, the Criminal Court, the Court of the Sub-Divisional Officer, the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, The Revenue Tribunal, Tribunal, the Sub-Divisional Officer, the Revenue Tribunal, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Limitation Act.7, the First Schedule, Court, Court, the First Schedule, Division Bench, Canara Bank Ltd., Warden Insurance Co. Ltd., State, AIR1956Bom447, the Division Bench, the High Court Section 29, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Court, the First Schedule, the First Schedule, Sec, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, the Magistrates Court, the Criminal Court, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Criminal Court, the Bombay Tenancy Act, the applicability of Section 36, the Criminal Court, XII, Criminal Court, Court, Sections 1, XII, the Sub-Divisional Officer, the Revenue Tribunal, the S. D. O. Nagpur, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Tahsildar, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Tribunal, S. D. O. Await, Shri Kamble, the Court of N.T. Nagpur, Court, the Court of Spl, Court, Tribunal, the Revenue Tribunal

CARDINAL: four, 4, 26, 10-6-1959, 145, 26, 1, 4, One, 128, 52-59-60, 23, 25/59-4, 24, 1, 1, 28, 23, 23, 10-6-1959, 28-11-1959, 1, 1, 23, 2, 1, 2, 1, 10-6-1959, 1, 1, 23, 1, 24, 2, 1, 2, 9 to 18, 1, 2, 9 to 18, 10, 2, two, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, AIR1953Bom35, 2, 2, two, 2, two, 1, 2, 2, 9 to 18, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 10-6-1959, 1, 10-6, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 24, 1, 128, 13, 2, 2, 2, 1, 23-11-1959, 3-7-1961, one, 21, 15/59-32, 31, 2, 14, two, 10/59-10(A)/64-65, 30-4-1965

QUANTITY: 38.18 acres

GPE: Randala, District Nagpur, law.5, Clause, Anjanabai, Anjanabai, Canara Bank

PERSON: Tahsil, Nagpur, Nagpur, Nagpur, Nagpur, Shri Govindrao, Ramji Thakre, Tahsildar, Nagpur, Nagpur, ho, C. N. Raman, Adarkar, Adarkar, Magistrate, Nagpur, theDeputy Collector, Radhesham, Govindrao, Radhesham, Reader Shri Kamble, M. Ranara, Collector, L.R. Nagpur

LOC: Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Tahsildar

DATE: 28-11-1959, 23-5-1963, 1958, the period of, three years, 29-11-1959, 4-11-1959, three years, 1908, 1961, 1908, three years, three years, three years, three years, three years, 1908, 1908, 1908, three years, 1908, 1958, 1908, 1908, 1908, 1908, 1908, 14, 1908, three years, 22, 23, 24, 37, 22, 23, 24, 37, 22, 23, 24, 37, almost 3 1/2 years, the first week of July, 18-7-1961.'and, 63-64, 1965, 7-8-1965

FAC: Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Tahsildar

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

NORP: Chapters X, Chapters X

LANGUAGE: Chapters