Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

United Motors (India) Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Bombay and anr.

Decided On : Dec-11-1952

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, the Sales Tax Act, Article 226, Article 226, Constitution, Article 226, Article 32, Article 32, Article 226, Article 32, Article 226, Article 32, Article 226, Article 32, Article 226, Article 226, the Sales Tax Act, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, the Sale Tax Act, Section 27, Section 30, Section 31, Section 34, Section 29, Section 67, the Sales Tax Act, Article 14 and Article 19, the Sales Tax Act, Constitution, Article 226, Article 32, Article, Section 2, Chapter II, Chapter III, Section 5, Section 6, Section 5, Section 5, Section 6, Section 5, Section 8, Section 6, Section 7, Section 8, Section 5, Section 5, Section 8, Section 9, Section 5, Section 7, Chapter III, Section 7, Section 10, Section 12, Section 11, Chapter V, Section 13, Section 14, Section 15, Section 16, Section 17, Section 18, Section 19, Section 20, Section 21, Chapter VI, Section 22, Section 23, Chapter VII, Section 45, Section 7, Section 11, Section 47, the Sales Tax Act, Constitution, Article 245, Constitution, Article 246(3, Constitution, Constitution, Article 286, Constitution, Article 286, Constitution, Article, Constitution, Article 286, Constitution, Article 286, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 286, Article 286 12, Article 245(1, Constitution, Constitution, Article 245(1, Article 286(1, Article 286(1, Article 286(1, Article 286(1, Constitution, Constitution, Article 286(1, Article 286(1)(a, Constitution, Constitution, Article 286(1)(a, Article 286(1, Article 286(1)(a, Constitution, the Sales Tax Act, Article 286, Article 286, Article 286(1, Constitution, Constitution, Article 286, Article 286(2, Article, the Sales Tax Act, the Sale of Goods Act, Article 286(1)(a, Article 245 and Article 286(1, Article 246 and Entry No, Constitution, the Constitution it, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 286(1, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(2, Section 5, Section 7, Section 8, Section 7, Chapter IV, Article 286, Section 45, Section 7, Section 7, Article 286 of the Constitution, Constitution, Section 7, Section 45, Constitution, Section 7, Constitution, Section 7, Constitution, Article 286, Constitution, Constitution, the Land Requisition Act, Constitution, Article 286, Article 286, Article 303, Constitution, Article 303, Article 286, Article,' and, Article 286, Article 286, Article 245, Constitution, Constitution, Article 286, Article 303, Constitution, Constitution, the Punjab Alienation of Land Act, Section 298 of the Government of India Act, Section 13A, Section 298, Section 298, Section 298, Section 99, Article 245, Constitution, Article 245, Section 99, Section 298, Section 298, Section 298, Article 286 of the Constitution, the Sales Tax Act, Constitution, Constitution, Article 286(1)(a, the Sales Tax Act, Article 14, the American Constitution, Section 5(3, Section 10(4, Section 5(3, Section 5(1, Section 10(4, Article 14, Section 46 of the Act, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article, Article 19 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 19, Article 19

ORG: the Bombay Sales Tax Act, Legislature, The Advocate-General, Court, the Advocate-General's, Walchandnagar Industries Ltd., The State of Bombay, the Bombay Sugarcane Cess Act, Court, the Advocate-General, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Courts, the High Court, the High Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Advocate-General, Government, the Advocate-General, Court, Court, the Advocate-General, The Advocate-General, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, The State of Tripura v., Court, Court, the Advocate-General, Court, Collector, the High Court, Civil Court, the Privy Council, Raleigh Investment Co. Ltd., Council, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, Legislature, the Advocate-General, The Advocate-General, Lady Dinbai's, Court, the Advocate-General, the High Court, the Supreme Court, The Union of India and Others, the Supreme Court, State, State, State, the State of Bombay, Sales Tax Authorities, General Tax, the State Government, Government, Legislature, Legislature, the State of Bombay, Chapter IX, the State Government, The State Government, the State Government, Legislature, the State Legislature, Parliament, the Legislature of a State, State, State, State, the State Legislature, Legislature, Lists, State, State, State, the Legislature of a State, Parliament, the State Legislature, State, State, State, State, the Advocate-General, the Government of India Act, The Government of India Act, Legislature, the Provincial Legislatures, the Government of India Act, State, the Sale of Goods Act, the Sale of Goods Act, the Provincial Legislatures, State, the Government of India Act, the State Legislature, the Provincial Legislature, the Government of India Act, the State Legislature, the Provincial Legislatures, the Government of India Act, the State Legislature, the State Legislature, a State Legislature, State, Parliament, State, State, the Advocate-General, State, the Advocate-General, the State Legislature, State, the State Legislature, State, the Advocate-General, the Advocate-General, State, State, Legislature, Treatise, the Sale of Personal Property, Legislature, State, State, Legislature, State, State, State, State, the Advocate-General, State, State, State, State, State, the State Legislature, the Bombay Legislature, the Advocate-General, Legislature, the Advocate-General, State, State, the Advocate-General, the State Legislature, the Advocate-General, the State Legislature, the Advocate-General, State, the Bombay Legislature, the State Legislature, State, State, The Advocate-General, the Advocate-General's, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, the Travancore Legislature (Since, the State of Travancore-Cochin and Others v., The Bombay Company Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the American Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Advocate-General, the State Legislature, State, State, State, State, the American Courts, the Advocate-General, The Advocate-General, Criminal Appeal No, Calcutta, Court, Legislature, State, State, State, Explanation, Legislature, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, State, The Supreme Court, Court, the Constituent Assembly, Assembly, Court, the State Legislature, Legislature, State, State, the State of Bombay, State, the State of Bombay, the State of Bombay, the State of Bombay, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, the Advocate-General, the State Government, the Advocate-General, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Government, the State Legislature, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, State, the State Government, Legislature, the State Government, the State of Bombay, State, the State of Bombay, State, the State Government, the State Legislature, Government, the State Government, State, State, State, the Advocate-General, Legislature, Court, Legislature, Court, State, the Bombay Land Requisition Act, Government, Legislature, Legislature, the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, Legislature, Court, Legislature, the Federal Court, the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, Legislature, Macleod, A.C. 455, the Colonial Legislature, the Advocate-General, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, the Advocate-General, Legislature, Legislature, Court, Court, Legislature, Court, the Advocate-General, the Advocate-General, the Advocate-General, Legislature, State, the Advocate-General, Legislature, Court, Legislature, State, Legislature, the Privy Council, the Union Legislature, the State Legislature, the Government of India Act, the Privy Council, Legislature, the Privy Council, Legislature, the Privy Council, the Provincial Legislature, Lordships, the Provincial Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, the Government of India Act, the Government of India Act, the Provincial Legislature, the Government of India Act, the Privy Council, The Advocate-General, State, State, the State Legislature, Legislature, Act, Legislature, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Stewart Dry Goods Co., the Advocate-General, the Advocate-General, State, the State of Saurashtra, the State of Saurashtra, the Advocate-General, Government, The Town Area Committee, the Advocate-General, Metro Motors, Metro Motors

DATE: 1952, 1948, several years, 1325, 1952, 1946, the three consecutive years, the first day of April, 1952, the year, the first day of April, 1952, the day, 9, 10, 47, the first of November, 1952, a little later, 25, six months, 1946, 54, 48, 48, 48, 54, 54, 54, 54, 1952, today, 54, 54, 6, three months, 1941, 1891, three consecutive years, these three years, the three year period, one year, the three subsequent years, next year, 32

CARDINAL: three, 2., 735, 1950CriLJ1514, 3., seven, one, one, seven, seven, one, seven, one, 9, 783, Two, 487, 5, 10, one, more than one, six, one, seven, 4., 1951]19ITR132(SC, 5, 1947, 15, 332, 74, 50, two, 6., 1950]1SCR869, two, 2, 30,000, 1, 30,000, 30,000, 6, 7, three, three, one-sixty-fifth, 1, 30,000, 30,000, 8, 5,000, 30,000, 5,000, 24, 26, 9, 12, 26, 9, 1, 2, one, three, 3, 10, 48, 54, 245, 246(3, 54, 13, 54, only one, 14, two, one, 23, 1952, 3, more than one, 15., 16, two, 129, 3, 396, 17, 227, 3, 405, 18, 30,000, 30,000, 19, three, one, three, 2, 5, two, 5, eight, two, 5, 2, 5, 1, 2, 2, 2, 5, 2, 5(2)(i, 2, 20, 26, 457, 22, 23, 1946, 1, 1, 19, 24, two, One, two, One, 25., 26, 19, 30,000, 5,000, 30,000, 5,000, one, 25,000, 30,000, 25,000, 30,000, 5,000, 30,000, 294, 10, 30,000, 30,000, 5,000, 27, 30,000, 30,000, 100, 28, 29, 6, 30, 1952]1SCR572, 31, only one, seven, six, 33

ORDINAL: first, second, third, first, first, second, third, first, first, first, first, second, third, first, first, first, second, first, second, first, second, third, third, seventh, seventh

GPE: the State of, Bombay, India, Bombay, Bombay, Halsbury, Vol, the City of Chester 87 ER, The Province of East, Ind.Ap, the State of Bombay, the State of, Bombay, the State of, Bombay, Bombay, India, the State of, Bombay, India, India, Leigislature, Bombay, the State of, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, States, States, India, India, India, States, the State of Bombay, the State of, Bombay, India, India, Bombay, India, India, the State of, Bombay, Bombay, Punjab Province, Province, India, U.S., Bombay, Baroda, Jalalabad, India

PERSON: Thappar v. State, Chiranjitlal Chowdhuri, Mukherjea, Gazette, Subject, Subject, Seervai, Benjamin, Alleppey, Seervai, Poppatlal Shah v. State, Venkatarama Ayyar, Govindarajulu Naidu, Venkatarama Ayyar, Heman Alreja, Maurice Gwyer, Maurice Gwyer, Articles, Daulat Singh, Majesty, Seervai, Seervai, Seervai, Seervai, Seervai, Seervai, Seervai, Seervai, Seervai, Seervai, Seervai, Seervai, Mohamad Yasin v.

LANGUAGE: English

LOC: Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras

EVENT: Sections 5, List II, List II, List II, List II, Sections 5

PRODUCT: Calcutta, 3 F.C.R. 12, Article

FAC: Constitutional, Constitutional

TIME: the impugned Act

NORP: Amreli, Amreli

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //