Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bai Sada Parshottam Vs. Gangaram Becher

Decided On : Feb-04-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 84

PERSON: Baker, J.1, Jambusar, Nos, Broach, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Ramasami Reddi, Roy I.L.R., Roy I.L.R., Daya Rama, Shripatprasadji, L.R., Shah J., Fawcett J.'s, Daya Rama, Beaton J., Narayan Roy, Ramamini Reddi, Dinkar, Nundo Lall Bhuttacharjee v. Bidhoo

CARDINAL: nine, 5, 9, 9, 1 to 3, 746, 155, 1 and 4, five, 1, 1 and 4, 3 and 4, 746, 1 and 4, 453, 460, 568, 21, 460, 458, 29, 219, 221, two, 17

DATE: June 28,1919, 1923, annual, annual, 1923, three years, annual, annual, 1923, 1920, 1918, 1920, year, annual, 1926, annual, 1886

ORDINAL: Second, second, first, second

ORG: the District Court, Court, the High Court, The High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Marudai, Midnapwr Zamindari Company, Naresh, L. R 363, Marudai Reddi, Court, the High Court, Privy Council, Midnapur Zamindary Company, Naresh, Court, the Bombay Land Revenue Code, Court, Privy Council, Midnapure Zamindary Company, Naresh, Marudai Reddi, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court

GPE: Reddi, Ld, Narayan, Daudbhai, Allibhai, Daya Rama, Ramasami Reddi, Ld, Narayan, it.3, Daudbhai, Allibhai, Barjorji v., Bavidbhai, Allibhai, Ld

LOC: Madras

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //