Calico Dyeing and Printing Works Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Ii - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Feb-25-1965

Court: Mumbai

LAW: section 66(1, section 10(2, section 10(2)(vii, section 10(2, section 66(1, section 10(2, section 10(5B, section 4, section 4, section 4, section 4, section 4, Section 54, the Sale of Goods Act

CARDINAL: two, 2, two, 8,22,001, 31-12-1954, 3,92,479, 3,92,479, 88,577, two, 88,577, two, 1, 2, 88,577, one, five, 1, 3, 8,22,001, 4A, 4,000, 4, 2,00,000, 6, three, 1, 1, 8,22,001, two, one, 4A, 4,000, 100, 4, 7, 8,22,001, 2, 4,000, 100, 2,22,001, 4, 4, four thousand, 3, 52, 100 quarters, 8, 4, two, 9

DATE: June, 1955, year 1956-57, the calendar year 1955, 1st June, 1955, 31st December, 1954, the assessment year 1956-57, 12th October, 1956, the period January 1, 1955, May 1, 1955, 2nd February, 1957, June 1, 1955, 31st December, 1954, the five months, 1st January, 1955, 31st May, 1955, previous year, the previous year, 1st day of June, 1955, 30th Day of June, 1955, 60 days, the 30th day of June, 1955, 30th June, 1955, 60 days

NORP: Indian

ORG: Calico Dyeing & Printing Works Limited, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Calico Dyeing & Printing Mills Limited, Clause 4A, Vendors, the Sale of Goods Act, the Transfer of Property Act, the Sale of Goods Act, the Sale of Goods Act, Bejamin on Sale, Aldridge

ORDINAL: second, Firstly, secondly, second, 8th, first, first, second

PERSON: Mehta, Mehta, Mehta, Mehta, Ismail Shah v., Saleh Muhammad Shah, Randhir Singh v., Randhir Singh, Ram Badan Lal v. Kunwar Singh, Mehta, Mehta, Johnson, Mehta, Ram Badan Lal v. Kunwar Singh