Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Ii Vs. Daulatran Nayar
Decided On : Mar-07-1976
Court : Mumbai
LAW: section 66(1, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 8, section 10, section 12B, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B, section 12B(2, section 12B, section 12B(2, section 12B(2
NORP: Tulzapurkar, J.1, Indian, Indian, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu
DATE: 1922, January 1, 1954, 1922, the assessment year 1960-61, the accounting year, the year, March 31, 1960, July 1, 1959, the assessment year 1960-61, January 1, 1954, July 1, 1959, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954, 9, 10, January 1, 1954, ' 7, April 1, 1956, the January 1, 1954, April 1, 1956, years, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1955, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954
FAC: Bombay City II
GPE: Bombay
ORDINAL: third, third, third, second, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third
CARDINAL: 2, seven, seven, 5, 62,500, seven, one, 62,500, 5, 62,500, seven, 3., 5, 5, 4, 5., 6, 12, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 8, 7, 7, 7, 3, 3, 2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 11
PERSON: Daulatran Nayar, Joshi, Joshi, Joshi, Joshi
ORG: HUF, M/s. India Woollen Textile Mills, Appellate, Appellate, Tribunal, Appellate, Judicial, the7