Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Ii Vs. Daulatran Nayar

Decided On : Mar-07-1976

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 66(1, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 8, section 10, section 12B, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B(2, section 12B, section 12B(2, section 12B, section 12B(2, section 12B(2

NORP: Tulzapurkar, J.1, Indian, Indian, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

DATE: 1922, January 1, 1954, 1922, the assessment year 1960-61, the accounting year, the year, March 31, 1960, July 1, 1959, the assessment year 1960-61, January 1, 1954, July 1, 1959, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954, 9, 10, January 1, 1954, ' 7, April 1, 1956, the January 1, 1954, April 1, 1956, years, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1955, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954, January 1, 1954

FAC: Bombay City II

GPE: Bombay

ORDINAL: third, third, third, second, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third

CARDINAL: 2, seven, seven, 5, 62,500, seven, one, 62,500, 5, 62,500, seven, 3., 5, 5, 4, 5., 6, 12, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 8, 7, 7, 7, 3, 3, 2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 11

PERSON: Daulatran Nayar, Joshi, Joshi, Joshi, Joshi

ORG: HUF, M/s. India Woollen Textile Mills, Appellate, Appellate, Tribunal, Appellate, Judicial, the7

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //