Kantilal Prekjit Patel Vs. Range Forest Officer and Another - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jul-21-1986

Court: Mumbai

LAW: Section 52 of the Act, section 52, Section 52, Section 52, Section 52, Section 52 of the Act, Section 52 of the Act, Section 52 of the Act, Section 52, Section 52 of the Act

ORG: ORDER1, Sharda Timber Mart', the Mobile Squad, Forest Department, the Judicial Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of the Sessions Judge, Pune, Magistrate, this Criminal Writ Petition, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, the Indian Forest Act, the Bombay Forest Rules, the Forest Authorities, Shri Agarwal, Shri Agarwal, the Mobile Squad, The Writ Petition, Pune

PERSON: Mill, the Saw Mill, Mill, Saw Mill, Mill, Saw Mill, Shri Kankaria, Mill, Shri Kankaria, Mill, Saw Mill, Mill, Saw Mill, Shri Kankaria

GPE: Yewat, Tal, F.C., Pune, Counsel, New Webster's

DATE: 19th March, 1984, 6429, two years, July 3, 1984, 1985, June, 1942, 1037, 6429, 2 years prior to 1st March, 12th February, 1985

CARDINAL: 16, 520, 1985.5, three, three, 871, 16, 1984.11, 80

ORDINAL: third, third

LANGUAGE: English

LOC: the Saw Mill, the Saw Mill.9