Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Trustees of the Sir Currimbhoy Ebrahim Baronetcy Trust Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Feb-26-1934

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 2, Section 5, Section 6, Section 7, Section 8, Section 29, Section 2, the General Clauses Act, Section 3, Section 4, section 66, Chapter III, Section 6, Section 8, Section 16, Section 14(2, Section 16, Section 23(1, Section 55, Chapter, Section 40, Section 8, Section 9.17

PERSON: Sidney Rowlatt, J.1, Currimbhoy Ebrahim, Provisos, Lordships, Williams, Cave, Cave, Atkinson, Shaw, Phillimore, Williams, Williams, Baronet, money.19, Lordships, Majesty

ORG: the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, the Sinking Fund, the Repair Fund, the Sinking Fund and Repair Fund, Sections 3 and 4, the Government of India, Chapter IX, the House of Lords, House, the United Kingdom Income-tax Acts, the House of Lords, Lordships, the Sinking Fund, the Repair Fund, Baronet, Lordships, the Sinking Fund and Repair Fund, Baronet, Baronet, Lordships

GPE: Bombay, the United Kingdom, New York

DATE: August 18, 1931, 1913, annually, the financial year, 1928-9, 1922, 1897, any year, that year, the previous year, annual, 56, any year, that year, the previous year, that year, any year, the same year 11, the year, Wrenbury

CARDINAL: two, roughly seventy-five, about ten, 8, 9, two, two, 55, three, 1,02,390, 20,223, 69,182, 1,91,795, 69,182, 1,91,795.13, 1921, two

ORDINAL: third, first, first

MONEY: fifteen per cent, for.15

NORP: Indian, Indian, Hindu, Hindu, Indian, Hindu, Indian

WORK_OF_ART: Charge of Income-tax', Taxable Income'

LOC: Finance Act.12

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //