Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Smt. Neelabai Mahadeo Salunke and Others Vs. Shamrao Tatoba Pawar and Others
Decided On : Jun-20-1994
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 110AA, Section 110AA, Chapter VII-A, the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Section 110A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110AA, Section 110AA, the Motor Vehicles Act 1939, the Motor Vehicles Act, Motor Vehicles Act, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110AA, Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, Section 110A of Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110A, Section 110AA, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110AA, Section 110AA, Section 110AA, Section 110AA, Section 110AA, Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110A of the Act, Section 110A of the Act
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 1, 3, 8, 923, One, 1, two, two, 1, 31-3-1980, 2, 2, 1, 2, 14, 5, 1, 6, 61, 8, 2, No.2, 2, 9, two, 10, 11, 12, 13
DATE: 1939, 8th January, 1986, 1980, 1939, 1939, 110AA, 1923, 1923, 8 of 1923, 31st March, 1980, 20th October, 1993, 31st March, 1980, 1939, 1980, 1923, 1939, 1980, 1939, 1923, 1923, 1923, 1923, 1939, 1923, 1939, 1980, 1939, 1939, 1923, 1939, 1923, 1923, six months, today, later than one month, today
ORG: Workmen's Compensation, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Smt, Neelabai Mahadeo Salunkhe, Sangli, Arjun Mahadeo, the New India Insurance Company Ltd., The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd., the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli, Arjun Mahadeo Salunkhe, Arjun Mahadeo Salunkhe, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli, Tribunal, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the High Court, Court, Karnataka Hign Court, Court, the Claims Tribunal, Court, the Claims Tribunal under Section 110A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Court, Workmen's Compensation, Court, Court, Court, Court, Workmen's Compensation, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Arjun Mahadeo, Tribunal, Workmen's Compensation, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court, Workmen's Compensation, the Commissionerfor Workmen's Compensation, Workmen's Compensation, Workmen's Compensation, Registrar, Appellate Side, Workmen's Compensation, Court, Court
EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Case, Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act
PERSON: Kumar Mahadev Salunkhe, Babasaheb Salunkhe, Shri Laxmanrao A. Chavan, Laxamanrao A.Chavan, B. Prabhakar v. Smt, Bachima, Shri G. R. Rege, Shri Apte, Anthony Lobo v. C. M. Merchand 1979 Lab IC, Vaidya, Shirstedar
ORDINAL: first, third, first
TIME: the noon
WORK_OF_ART: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
PRODUCT: Amending Act 56 of 1969
NORP: Valid
GPE: Karnataka, Karnataka