Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Punjab Province Vs. Daulat Singh
Decided On : Jan-30-1946
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 5, Punjab Act X, Section 298, The Punjab Act, Section 5, Section 13A, the Punjab Alienation of Land Act, Indian Act XIII, Section 2(3, Section 2(4, Section 3, Section 14, Section 6, Section 6(1, Section 9(1, Section 4, Section 9(1, Section 1(2, Section 5, Section 14, the Punjab Alienation of Land (Second Amendment) Act, Section 13A, Section 21, Section 5, Section 298, Section 298 of the Act of 1935, Section 298, Section 4, Section 298, Section 298, Section 6(2, Section 298, Section 5, Section 298 of the Act of 1935, Section 5, Section 298, Section 13A, Section 298 of the Act of 1935, Section 298(2, Section 298, Section 292 of the Act of 1935, Section 292, Section 298, Section 298, Section 205, Section 298, Section 298, Section 4, Section 13A, Section 298(1, Section 298(1, Section 298 of the Act of 1935, Section 23, the Indian Contract Act, the Indian Trusts Act, Section 298 of the Act of 1935, Section 99, Section 298, Section 298, Section 298(1, Section 298, Section 13A, Section 5, Section 298 of the Act of, Section 298, Section 13A, Section 5, Section 9
GPE: Thankerton, Lahore, India, the District of Sialkot, India, India, India, Burma, India, India, India, India
NORP: J.1, Punjab, Punjab, British, avoided.18, British
ORG: the Federal Court of India, the High Court of Judicature at, the High Court, Court, the Punjab Provincial Legislature, the Local Government, the Provincial Government, Punjab Government Notification No., Court, this Board of the correctness, the Lahore High Court, Court, Court, the civil Courts, the Provincial Government, the Court of the Subordinate, the Punjab Legislature, Civil Court, the Federal Court, Crown, the Government of India Act, Lordships, the Provincial Legislature, the Government of India Act 1935, the Provincial Legislature, the Allahabad High Court, the Federal Court, the Lahore High Court, the High Court of Lahore, Lordships, The High Court, the Federal Court, the High Court, the High Court, Lordships, the High Court, the Punjab Legislative Assembly, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Board, Lordships, Lordships, Board, Lordships, the Federal Legislature, the Provincial Legislature, inter alia, Court, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, the Provincial Legislature, Lordships, the High Court, the Federal Court, Lordships, the Provincial Legislature, the Federal Court, Court, Court, the Federal Court, the Federal Court, Lordships, the Federal Court, the High Court, the Provincial Legislature, Lordships
DATE: May 8, 1942, February 27, 1941, July 22, 1940, 1938, 1938, 1935, 1938, 1900, June 1, 1939, twenty years, 1937, April 18, 1904, 1932, 1932, the year 1933, 1904, February, 1939, June 1, 1939, 1938, possession.10, October, 1939, November 27, 1939, 1935, May 27, 1940, June 22, 1940, 1938, 8, 1942, 1942, 1935, 1942, five years, 1942, 1872, 1882
PERSON: Nos, Sialkot, Schedule, Khan A. I. R, Qadir Bakhsh v. Hakam I.L.R, Jumman, Nos, Schedule, Gopal Das, Jumman, Nos, Gopal Das, Nos, Nos, Nos, Majesty, Atiqa Began v., Abdul Maghni, Nos, Singh J., Monroe, Gwyer CJ., Varadachariar J., Beaumont J., Varadachariarj J., Gwyer CJ., Gopal Das, Beaumont J. sums, Pritt, Gopal Das, Majesty, Beaumont J. holds, Ptitt, Majesty, Varadachariar J., Nos, Majesty
CARDINAL: 2, 3, 3 to 5, 6 to 13, one, 1, 2, one, two, 1925, 65, 13, 713, one, 2, 3, 1, 1,500 to one, 1, four, as follows:- 13A., 2, 2, 2, 3, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2, 2, 3, 9, 2, 2, 1, 2.12, 1, two, 2, three, one, two, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, three, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 19, two, 1, 1, 96, 1, one, 2, 2, Three, 2, only one, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 1
FAC: the Official Gazette, the Governor-General, Sections 84
TIME: the impugned Act, the impugned Act, the impugned Act, the impugned Act, the impugned Act became law, the impugned Act, the impugned Act
ORDINAL: first, first, first, second, first, first, second, third