Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Emperor Vs. Gopal Shinde Patel

Decided On : Jan-18-1933

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 45, Section 435, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 495, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 495, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, the Abkari Act, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, the General Clauses Act, the Police Act, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, the Excise Act, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, the Dangerous Drugs Act (II of, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 495, Section 537 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 495, the Opium Act, Section 495, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 495 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 537 of the Criminal Procedure Code.6, Section 495, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 495 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act and Section 495, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 495, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Abkari Act, Section 495, Section 495, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 495, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 495, Section 495, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 495, Section 495, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 495, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 495, Section 25, the Evidence Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 25, Section 41, the Abkari Act, Section 495, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 25, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 25, the Evidence Act, the Bombay Amending Act XII, the Abkari Act, the Abkari Act, Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 495 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 125 of the Evidence Act, Section 25, The Evidence Act, Section 125, Section 25, Section 125, Section 125, the Abkari Act, the Indian Evidence Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Abkari Act, Section 495, Section 495, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 495, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 25, the Indian Evidence Act

PERSON: J.1, Kanara, Karwar, Nanoo, I.L.R., L.R. 1196, Ibrahim Ahmad v. King-Emperor, Radha Kishun v. Emperor, Bihar, Hurribole Chunder, Cal, Charles Stanley Wilson, Justice Shah, Justice Hayward, Shah J., Tribhovandas I.L.R., L.R., Excise Officers, Excise Officers, i. e., Broomfield, J.8, Charles Stanley Wilson, Justice Hayward, Nanoo, Marten C.J., Shah J., Babu Lal I.L.R., Government Pleader, Fawcett J., Queen v., Hurribole Chunder, Cal, Kemp J., Coelho

CARDINAL: Two, One, 4, 78, 28, five, one, 34, two, 418, 533, 4, 271, 4, 1, 6601, 4, One, one, 4, 4, 4, 1, 4, 418, 4, 4).11, 1926)28BOMLR1196, 4, 4, 1206, one, 1211):-In, 509, 513, 4, 207, 1211):-The, 1212):-It, 4, 4, 4, 4, 1

ORG: the Court of the City Magistrate, the Bombay Abkari Act, the Abkari Inspector, Magistrate, Court, Akbari, Court, the Bombay City Police Act, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, AIR1932Cal122, the Patna High Court, L.J. 1 Section B, Court, the Local Government, Calcutta, I.L.R., Courts of Justice, Court, Shah, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Sub-Inspectors, this High Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Government, Court, this High Court, Shah, Shah, Magistrate, Court, Empress, Oldfield, J. (, Court, I.L.R., Court, High Courts, Advocate-General, The Local Government, the Government of India, Court, Marten C.J., the Bombay Abkari Act, Sections 41, Court

DATE: 1926, 1861, 1890, 1902, 1931, 1260, 1932, 1930, 1876, 207, 1919, 1919, August 6, 1919, 1902, December 13, 1932, 1923, 1912, December 13, 1932, 1912, 1919, 1919, August 6, 1919 (Unrep., 1884, 1876, only four years, 1912, 1912, '14, 1209, 1872, 1887, 41A, 41B, 41C, 1912, 1912, 1912, 1872, 1923, eleven years, 1923

GPE: Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Matilall Kalwar, Bombay, Imperator, Emperor, Hayward J.'s, Imperator, Emperor, Emperor, Bombay

NORP: Abkari, Abkari, Abkari

ORDINAL: second, first, first, second

LOC: interpretation.5, Actand

EVENT: the Criminal Procedure Code, Bombay Act XII

FAC: Hayward JJ., Hayward JJ., Hayward JJ, the Bombay Abkari (Amendment

WORK_OF_ART: the Excise Officers

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //