Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi State Electricity Workers Union and Ors.

Decided On : Jan-27-2015

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 15, Section 16 and Section 60, Section 16, Section 16, Section 16, Section 16, the Tripartite Agreement, Section 15 and Section 16, Section 16, Central Act 54, Section 14, Section 18, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14, Section 5, Rule 6, Order I Rule 10, the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 1 Rule 10(2, Order II, Order 1 Rule 10, the Code of Civil Procedure, Defendant No.2 to 4, Order 1 Rule 10(4, Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 6, Rule 17, Order 6 Rule 17, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 141 of the Code, Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code, Section 16-20, Section 21, the Limitation Act

DATE: January 08, 2015, January 27, 2015 +, May 20, 2014, May 20, October 28, 2000, 2000, 2000, October 28, 2000, 2000, every year, September 16, 2002, June 25, 2003, December 30, 2003, May 15, 2004, July 28, 2004, July 01, 2002, April 01, 2007, September 13, 2007, July, 2002, January 17, 2008, 2002, 2000, 2001, the past period, 2010, May 03, 2010, September 05, 2011, No.6 to 8.15, 6, 7, 2000, 2000, 2000, 16, 2000, 2001, August 28, 2010, 2001, 2000, 2001, 2001, 2001, 19A, September 13, 2007, 2000, 2000, 2000, 6, 1948, 1948, 2001, 2000, 1958, October 28, 2000, the year 2008, 2000, 2001, November 21, 2001, 2001, 20, September 05, 2011, the year 2011, 1998, 1987, 42, 1993, September 05, 2011, 2009, 2002, 2007, 2002, 2006, 6, Rule 17, 1984, 1975, 2002, 11 years, 1994, 4) AD, 2006, 2006, 1963, 2008, 2007, 2000, 2001

PERSON: Appellant Represented, A.S.Chandhiok, Anupam Varma, Nikhil Sharma, Rahul Kinra, Vedanta Verma, Meenakshi Midha, Siddhartha Nagpal, Zubeda Begum, Appellant Represented, Sandeep Sethi, Anupam Varma, Nikhil Sharma, Rahul Kinra, Vedanta Verma, Meenakshi Midha, Siddhartha Nagpal, Zubeda Begum, Appellant Represented, Sandeep Sethi, Anupam Varma, Nikhil Sharma, Rahul Kinra, Vedanta Verma, Meenakshi Midha, Siddhartha Nagpal, Zubeda Begum, CM No.14539/2013, W.P.(C, No.1698/2010, Charan Gupta, W.P.(C, M.L.Sondhi, M.L.Sondhi, M.L.Sondhi, Genco, Transco, Genco, DPCL, Delhi Vidyut, Schedule H.34, Transco, Janardhan Kashinath Kadam, Sarup Gupta Vs, Krishna Reddy Vs, S. Mariam Bee.44, Defendant No.2 to 4, Sudhakaran Nadar, Trimbak Tanksale, Manohar Singh, Ma Shwe Mya v., Maung Mo, Sen Wadhera, DLT314Larsen, held:“8, Order, Vinod Kumar Vs, JANUARY27 2015

ORG: STATE ELECTRICITY WORKERS UNION & ORS, Respondents Represented, Advocate for Pension Trust/R-3 LPA8122014 BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD, STATE ELECTRICITY WORKERS UNION & ORS, Respondents Represented, Advocate for Pension Trust/R-3 LPA8132014 BSES, STATE ELECTRICITY WORKERS UNION & ORS, Respondents Represented, Advocate for Pension Trust/R-3 CORAM, JUSTICE, JUSTICE, Order VI Rule, CM No.14539/2013, Court, Court, Delhi Electricity Supply Undertaking, the Delhi Vidyut Board, Delhi Vidyut Board Employees Terminal Benefit Fund, Sections 14, the Delhi Vidyut Board, the Delhi Vidyut Board, Delhi Vidyut Board, the Transfer Scheme Rules, SBI Caps, Delhi Vidyut Board, the Delhi Vidyut Board, SBI Caps, the Delhi Vidyut Board, Board of Trustees, Delhi Vidyut Board, the Government of NCT, the Delhi Vidyut Board Employees Terminal Benefit Fund, Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd., BSES Yamuna Power Ltd., Rajdhani Power Ltd., The Government of NCT, Order I Rule, the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, the Delhi Electricity Reforms, Delhi Vidyut Board, GNCTD & Ors, the Supreme Court, the Delhi Vidyut Board, the Government of NCT Delhi, the Government of NCT Delhi, Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd., BSES Yamuna Power Ltd., Rajdhani Power Ltd., Nos.3, Delhi Transco Ltd., DPCL, Delhi Power Company Ltd., Court, the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, the Delhi Vidyut Board, the Delhi Vidyut Board, the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, Qualification Documents, the Delhi Vidyut Board, Sections 15, Sections, the Delhi Electricity Reforms, the Delhi Vidyut Board, the Government of NCT, Delhi Vidyut Board, BSES Yamuna Power Ltd., BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd., TATA, Delhi Distribution Ltd., Delhi Transco Ltd., Indraprastha Power Generation Co.Ltd., Delhi Power Company Ltd., DPCL, Discom 1, Discom 2, Discom, the Government of NCT, the Delhi Electricity Reform Act, the Delhi Electricity Reform, the Delhi Electricity Reform (Transfer Scheme) Rules, the Delhi Electricity Reform (Transfer Scheme) Rules, Discoms, Discoms, the Delhi Electric Reforms Act, Sections of the Delhi Electric Reforms Act, Delhi Vidyut Board, the Delhi Electric Reforms Act, Board, the Electricity (Supply) Act, Board, Board, the Delhi Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules, the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, the Delhi Vidyut Board, the Delhi Vidyut Board, DISCOM1 DISCOM2and, Board, TRANSCO, Board, the Delhi Vidyut Board, the Delhi Vidyut Board, LPA No.811/2014 & conn, the Government of NCT, the Government of NCT, Delhi Vidyut Board, the Delhi Electric Reforms Act, the Delhi Electricity Reforms, the Request for Qualification (RFQ, the Delhi Vidyut Board, Delhi Vidyut Board, Discom 2, Discom, Discoms, the Government of NCT, Delhi Vidyut Board, Delhi Vidyut Board, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Delhi Vidyut Board, The Government of NCT, the Government of NCT, Delhi Vidyut Board, Court, Court, SCC491Bachhaj Nahar, Nilima Mandal & Anr, Deshpande & Ors, Bishun Narain Inter College & Anr.41, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, The High Court, Subordinate, Delhi Vidyut Board, the Government of NCT, the Government of NCT, the Delhi Vidyut Board, the Government of NCT, Rajat Pandhi & Anr.47, Fritiz T.M. Clement & Anr, the Supreme Court, SCC737Ramchandra Sakharam Mahajan Vs, Court, the Supreme Court, the Trial Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the High Courts, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Rent Control, Venkateswaralu Vs Motor, General Traders, the Court observed:“15, Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Scindia Potteries and Services ltd Vs, Land and Development Officer, Court, the High Court, Tourbo Ltd., UOI, CPC, State, Authority, Orders, State, Orrisa.9, the State Government, Neepaz, Counsel for the Petitioner, Neepaz, Court, Union of India & Ors, Court, CPC, Kerela State Electricity Board, SCC447Southern Petrochemical Industries Co. Ltd., Electricity Inspector& Etio, the Delhi Electric Reforms Act, the Delhi Electricity Reforms

NORP: J.1, DISCOMS, Muslims

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, second, second, second, first, first, second, first, first, second, second, firstly, secondly, first, second

CARDINAL: 17, three, No.3, 5, three, 2014.2, 17, only two, 15, 6(1, No.2, 3, No.2, 1329, transferee, No.2, No.2-fund.8, 5, 6, 6, 2001.11, No.2, three, three, three, transferee, three, 5, Three, 3A, 3B, 3, 4, 4a, 4b, 5A, 6A, 7A, 9A, 5, 9, 19, 24, No.3, 7, No.2, 3, 3A, transferee, 3B, 4, 60, 6(8, 6(9, 4a, 4b, six, 3, 3, 5, 6, 5A, 6, 6A, 6(8, 7, 7A, 6(8, 3(d, 4, 9, one, 9A, 17, three, three, No.3, 7, 3, 7, one, 15(7, transferee, transferee, 15(9, 1, transferee, 2, transferee, transferee, 27, 6.28, 9, 54, 3(2, 1, 6(8, 9, 6(9, 29, 20, 19, 3, 1, 3, three, transferee, six, six, six, 2, three, three, six, six, six, six, six, six, 20, six, six, six, 8, 2, 4, 43, 3, six, six, six, six, 157, 3, two-fold, 6, 5, 6, one, two, 51, 3, 1, 52, 7, 221, 56, 129, 57, 135, 13, 5

LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single Judge.59

PRODUCT: Order VI Rule, No.1, 1,253.54, No.1, No.1, No.1

GPE: Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Genco, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Genco, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Bachhaj, Delhi, meet.46, Delhi, Delhi, India, suits.54, Delhi

TIME: 10 of the Code of, 9 of Section 15

PERCENT: 49%, 100%

EVENT: words:“8