Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Swami Chemicals

Decided On : Oct-08-2003

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 11AC, Rule 173Q, Section 11A, Section 11AC, Section 11A, Section 11AC, Rule 173Q, Rule 173Q, Section 11A, Section 11A, Section 11AC, Section 11AC, Rule 173Q, Section 11AC, Section 11AC

CARDINAL: 2, 20,416/-.3, 148, 577, 173Q., 55, 275, 1, 1, 55, 275, 21, 148, 497, 142, 515.7, three, greater than three, one third, two, one, 118, 650, 99, ten

ORG: the Commissioner (Appeals, notice.4, The Commissioner (Appeals, Hindustan Wires Ltd, ELT, the Supreme Court, it.5, the Supreme Court, P &, B Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd, CCE, the Supreme Court, P &amp, B Pharmaceutical Pvt Ltd, CCE, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, CCE, ELT, Nagpur Alloy Castings Ltd, ELT, this Tribunal in Escorts JCB Ltd, ELT, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State of Madhya Pradesh, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd, ELT, the Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra

DATE: 14.11.2002, section 11AC, 2003, Section 11AC, 2003, 2002, 55, 76, Section 11AC, under Section 11AC, thirty days, Section 11AC, 1998, 33, 1976

PRODUCT: Rule 173Q and Section 11AC, Rule 173Q, Rule 173Q

PERSON: H.M.M. Ltd 1995, Mal Ke Pravesh, Kar Adhiniyam

ORDINAL: second

PERCENT: 25%