Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Perfect Latex Pvt. Ltd.

Decided On : Oct-07-2003

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: the Foreign Trade Act, Section 111(o, the Customs Act and Rule 209, the Customs Act, Section 111(O, the Customs Act, Section 112, the Customs Act, Section 59, the Customs Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2-6-2000, 20-1-86, 21-11-95, 22-6-1994, 833.65, 139, 117, 114, 154, 580, 8.5, 88.56, 121.10, 833.85, 209, 86, 464

DATE: 18-10-2001, 1989-90, 1992, 24-11-2001, 1999, 60, 1996-97, 2003, 1992, 1995-96, 1989-90, 24-11-2001, first five years, 1995-96, 1995-96, 1944, 1996

PERSON: Manoj Arora, Order, Order, Notifications, Chandigarh, E.O.U., Notification No.5/86-C.E., Order, Kesoram Rayon, NEPZ

ORG: Advocate, the Board for Industrial &amp, Financial Reconstruction, Customs, the Foreign Trade (Development &, the Letter of Approval, Letter of Approval, the Commissioner of Customs, the Letter of Approval, Teg's Masrado Ltd., CCE, Chandigarh - 2002, Reliance, Vishal Footwear ltd, CCE, Shri D.N. Chaudhary, SDR, the Larger Bench, Himalaya International Ltd., CCE, Customs, DGFT, Foreign Trade (Development &, Order, the Development Commissioner,, Noida Export Processing Zone, M/s. Perfect Latex Pvt. Ltd., E.O.U., Order, the Letter of Approval, the Apex Court, EPZ, EPZ, EPZ, Customs, the Adjudicating Authority, Show Cause Notice, the Adjudicating Authority, the Grounds of Appeal, Domestic Tariff Area, M/s.Perfect Latex

PERCENT: 100%, 100%, 100%, 90%, 100%, less than 30.9%, 100%, 100%

GPE: USSR, USA, Proviso, India, C.C., Calcutta, S.C.

NORP: Central Excise

PRODUCT: 33/94-Cus, Notifications

EVENT: Regulation) Act, Regulation) Act

WORK_OF_ART: the Larger Bench

FAC: Himalaya International

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //