Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Customs Vs. Perfect Latex Pvt. Ltd.
Decided On : Oct-07-2003
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: the Foreign Trade Act, Section 111(o, the Customs Act and Rule 209, the Customs Act, Section 111(O, the Customs Act, Section 112, the Customs Act, Section 59, the Customs Act
CARDINAL: 1, 2-6-2000, 20-1-86, 21-11-95, 22-6-1994, 833.65, 139, 117, 114, 154, 580, 8.5, 88.56, 121.10, 833.85, 209, 86, 464
DATE: 18-10-2001, 1989-90, 1992, 24-11-2001, 1999, 60, 1996-97, 2003, 1992, 1995-96, 1989-90, 24-11-2001, first five years, 1995-96, 1995-96, 1944, 1996
PERSON: Manoj Arora, Order, Order, Notifications, Chandigarh, E.O.U., Notification No.5/86-C.E., Order, Kesoram Rayon, NEPZ
ORG: Advocate, the Board for Industrial &, Financial Reconstruction, Customs, the Foreign Trade (Development &, the Letter of Approval, Letter of Approval, the Commissioner of Customs, the Letter of Approval, Teg's Masrado Ltd., CCE, Chandigarh - 2002, Reliance, Vishal Footwear ltd, CCE, Shri D.N. Chaudhary, SDR, the Larger Bench, Himalaya International Ltd., CCE, Customs, DGFT, Foreign Trade (Development &, Order, the Development Commissioner,, Noida Export Processing Zone, M/s. Perfect Latex Pvt. Ltd., E.O.U., Order, the Letter of Approval, the Apex Court, EPZ, EPZ, EPZ, Customs, the Adjudicating Authority, Show Cause Notice, the Adjudicating Authority, the Grounds of Appeal, Domestic Tariff Area, M/s.Perfect Latex
PERCENT: 100%, 100%, 100%, 90%, 100%, less than 30.9%, 100%, 100%
GPE: USSR, USA, Proviso, India, C.C., Calcutta, S.C.
NORP: Central Excise
PRODUCT: 33/94-Cus, Notifications
EVENT: Regulation) Act, Regulation) Act
WORK_OF_ART: the Larger Bench
FAC: Himalaya International