India Trade Promotion Organization Vs. Director General of Income Tax (Exemptions) and Othe

Decided On : Jan-22-2015

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Finance Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 154, Section 10, Section, Section, Section, Section, Section 154, Section 154, Section 154, Section 25, the Companies Act, Section 25, the Companies Act, Section, Section 154, the Incometax Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 25, the Companies Act, Section 2, Act, section 11, section 10, the Income tax Act, Section 2, Section 2, Article 14, the Fourteenth Amendment, the U.S. Constitution, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution on the, Section 10 of the Payment of Bonus Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.21, Constitutional, Constitutional, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 16, Constitution, Article 16, Article 14, Article 14, Article 16, Article 16, Constitutional, Article 14, Article 16, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.26, the Finance Act, Constitutional Law, Constitution, Section, Section 147, Section 147, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Article 14, Section, Section 10, section 10, section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section, Section 154, Section 25, the Companies Act, the Finance Act, Section 25, the Companies Act, Section 10, Section, Section, Section, the BIS Act, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Constitutional, Section 2, the Finance Act, Article 14 of the Constitution India, Constitutional, Constitutional, Section

GPE: NEW DELHI +, Delhi, Pragati Maidan, Pragati, Pragati, Pragati, Pragati, Pragati, Pragati, Pragati, 03.09.2008, India, India, Kerala, Rajasthan, Kerala, Infoparks Kerala, Infoparks, India, Delhi, India, G.S., India, G.S., India, India, G.S., Bhagwati, Bezwada Municipality, Canada, Kerala, observations:‗10, New Delhi, West Bengal, India, States, States, Pragati, India, India, States, India, India, Karnataka, Bros:1964, Bros., India, India, Kerala, G.S., India, Belgium, India, India, Belgium, India

CARDINAL: 01.2015, 23.01.2013, 23.02.2012, 21.12.2011, 23.02.2012, 23.02.2012, 23.02.2012, 23.02.2012, 27.04.1976, 6, about four, exhibitions.8, 24.08.2009, one, 23.02.2012, 23.02.2012, 23.01.2013, 23.02.2012, 23.01.2013, 154, 13, 23.01.2013, 329, 23.01.2013, three, three, 15, 15, 29.02.2008:―180, 17, 3, 26AAB, 18, 15, 15, 3, two, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 23, 26, 3, 20, 23.01.2013, 2, 212, 3, 04.07.2013, 4, 1, 219, four, 3, two, one, 14, 16, 3, at least insofar, 23.02.2012, 01.04.2009, 25, two, 1, 56, 2, 61, more than one, 1, more than one, 1, 121 ITR1(SC, 34, 2, 2SCR483 493, 6, 37, 11, 5, 36, 3, 14, one, 15, ten, 41, 1, 2, 2, 2C, 23.01.2013, two, two, 1, 5, 258, 121 ITR1(SC, 57, 58, 23.01.2013

PERSON: M.S. Syali, Mayank Nagi, Joginder Sukhija, Shobit Saxena, BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE, VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, WP(C, Maidan Complex, Maidan Complex, Maidan Complex, Maidan Complex, Maidan Complex, Maidan Complex, Pragati Maidan, Pragati Maidan, Info Parks Kerala, Syali, Simplification Measures, years.‖ 16, Bill, Syali, Syali, Syali, Khandige Sham Bhat, Ashwathanarayana Shetty, Supp, WP(C, K.T. Moopil Nair v. State, Hidayatullah, Cinemas, Syali, Syali, Syali, Syali, ITR99(Del, DGIT(E, WP(C, E.P. Royappa v. State, Tamil Nadu:1974, Articles 14, Articles 14, Bose, J., Articles 14, Articles 14, Syali, Lok Sabha, Syali, Syali, Surat Art Silk, Syali, Syali, Suruchi Aggarwal, para 12(d, Arun Kumar, Colin Howard, Radhakrishnan, Arun Kumar, Supp, Ms Aggarwal, ITR419, Ms Aggarwal, Surat Art Silk, Ms Aggarwal, Ms Aggarwal, Supp, Abdul Jabar Butt v. State of, Ali M.K. v. State, Mullins, Surrey, Shah Bhojraj Kuverji, Yograj Singh, Ms Aggarwal, Art Silk, Ms Aggarwal, Art Silk, Krishna Iyer, Krishna, Ms Aggarwal, Syali, Syali, Syali, Act.40, Maidan, Syali, H. Abdul Bakhi, ICAI(II, purpose‖. Obviously, Addl, Surat Art Silk, H. Abdul Bakhi, Bros, H. Abdul Bakhi, Bill 2008.56, GS1, GS1, GS1, GS1, GS1, DURREZ AHMED

ORG: Sr Standing Counsel, the First Proviso to Section, inter alia, the CBDT Circular No.11/2008, the Union Cabinet, Re 1, The Central Government, DDA, the India International Trade Fair, the Commissioner of Police, Government of India, Cabinet, the Department of Commerce, the Ministry of Commerce and Industries, the Government of India, the Board of Directors, Managing Directors, Government of India, the Civil Services, Section 154 Application, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh State Seed Certification Agency, Cabinet, Foreign Trade, inter alia, India International Trade Fair Organisation, the Ministry of Commerce, Indian Council of Trade Fairs and Exhibitions, ICTFE, Directorate of Exhibitions, Commerce Ministry, Parliament, Finance, State Agricultural Marketing Boards, SAMB, APMC, SAMB, House, CBDT, Chambers of Commerce, the Supreme Court, State, State, State, Court, East India Tobacco Co., SCC696 Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Association of India v. Union of India, SCC634 Kerala Hotel & Restaurant Association, Gannon Dunkerley, Co., Court, Court, Jalan Trading Co., Mill Mazdoor Union, Court, Court, Twyford Tea Co. Ltd., The State of Kerala, CJ, Ámbassador, Andhra Pradesh State Seed Certification Agency, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Andhra Pradesh State Seed Certification Agency, Institute of Chartered Accountants, Income Tax, Institute of Chartered Accountants, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, State, State, State, the Budget Speech of, Circular, Reliance, Andhra Pradesh & Others:1993, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Arun Kumar, Others v. Union of India, ―Australian Federal Constitutional Law‖, Court, Court, Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh and Ors, Legislature, Court, the Supreme Court, Delhi Transport Corporation, Mazdoor Congress, Ors.:1991, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Institute of Chartered Accountants, Bureau of Indian Standards, G.S. 1, Dalmia Cement, Bharat, Limited, Dewan Chand Builders and, Contractors v. Union of India & Others:2012, Institute of Chartered Accountants, the Supreme Court, Surat Art Silk, Reliance, the Petitioners on Additional CIT, the Petitioner institute, the Supreme Court, Haryana Acrylic Manufacturing Co., CIT v. Indo-Mercantile Bank, the Supreme Court, Jammu & Kashmir:1957, Ram Narain Sons Ltd., Macmillan, Madras & Southern Maharatta Railway Co., Vide also Corporation of City of Toronto, the Supreme Court, Ginning Factory, Calcutta Tramways Co. Ltd., Corporation of Calcutta, the Supreme Court, Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industries, the Supreme Court, Bengal National Chamber of Commerce, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, State, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, State, important.46, inter alia, State, the Supreme Court, Khoday Distilleries Ltd, the Supreme Court, State of Andhra Pradesh, the Supreme Court, Section, Court, Bureau of Indian Standards, the Bureau of Indian Standards, Court, State, BIS, ICAI, the Supreme Court, ICAI, the Budget Speech, Speech, Parliament, the Surat Art Silk, ICAI, Income Tax, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, State of Andhra Pradesh, CBDT, Finance, Quantum

NORP: J.1, Indian, Indian, egalitarian, Gujarat, Indian, Surat

DATE: 1961, 2008, 01.05.2008, the assessment year 2007-08, the assessment year 2009-10, the assessment year 2009-10, 19.12.2008, the assessment year 2009-10, 23.02.2012, 23.05.2012, the initial 5 years, 1956, the years, March 2011, decades, each year, annual, November, 1956, 01.05.2008, the assessment year 2009-2010, 1961, year, 1961, 1961, 1961, 2010, 1956, 2008, 1st April, 2009, the 1st day of April, 2009, 2008, 1978, 1979, 1963, 1963, 1989, 1990, 1993, 22, 1966, 1965, the accounting year, several years, one year, the law.‖ 27, 1970, etc.‖ 28, 2013, 3147/2012, 7797/2009, 26.09.2013 (2013, 205.23, 16, 16, 16, 16.‖ 25, 2008, 2010, a given previous year, 1979, 31, 1st April, 2009, 1980, four years, six years, 59, 1955, 1944, 1946, 2003, 1880, 38, a previous year, 42, 01.05.2008, year 2009-10, 23.02.2012, annual, 1956, 2008, year 2009-10, 49, 50, 2002, 2008, 52, 1980, 70, 72, 2008, 2008, six weeks

FAC: Trade Fairs and Exhibitions, Pragati Maidan, the Lok Sabha, Venkateshwara Theatre v. State of, K.T. Moopil Nair's, Moopil Nair's, Venkateshwara Theatre v. State of, the Surat, Pragati Maidan

QUANTITY: 123.50 acres, 2 LLJ546

WORK_OF_ART: day.9, Arun Kumar

PRODUCT: Memorandum, 210, Insofar, ……

ORDINAL: fourth, third, second, second, first, first, first, second, second, first, first, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, third

LOC: Debate

PERCENT: 4%, 75%

MONEY: 75 per cent

EVENT: International Trade Fair