Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bayer Abs Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Decided On : Jun-25-2003

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: Rule 173C, Rule 173C, Section 4, Section 2(h, Circular, Central Excise Act, Section 4, Section 2(2, Section 4, Section 4(1)(a, Section 4(ia, Section 4(ia

CARDINAL: 1, 39.03, 31.5.96, two, some 10 or 12, 1.6.99, 29.10.2001, 24.5.2000, 2, 53, 1, 180, 650, 155, 8, 14, 433, 5, 6.

ORG: House Hold Appliances, Computer Appliance, the Customers/Dealers, M/s. Mansuklal Vanmalidas &amp, Contract, Central Excise Authority, the Hon'ble Tribunal, Escorts JCB Ltd., CCE, 533/29/00-CX, Prabhat Zarda Factory Ltd., Board Circular, Central, the Range Office, Insurance Policy, the Central Excise Audit, The Apex Court, Escorts JCB Ltd., Central Excise, Civil, Revenue, Escort JCB Ltd., ELT, Tribunal, the Apex Court, VIP Industries Ltd., Customs &amp, the Supreme Court, ELT, Court, Union of India, Bombay Tyre International Ltd., Madras Rubber Factory Ltd., ELT, VIP Industries Ltd., Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court

DATE: the period October 1996, Oct 96 to June 2000, 29/10/2001, the period October, 1996 to June, 2000, five years, Oct '96 to June 2000, 1944, May 2000, May 2000, May 2000, 2002, 2001, 2003, 1944, 1983, 1896, 1995, 1944

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first

NORP: Central Excise

PERSON: MF

WORK_OF_ART: the Larger Bench of the Hon'ble Tribunal, Place of Removal

LOC: Range

GPE: S.C., S.C., S.C., Govt, India, S.C.

PRODUCT: Central Excise

EVENT: Section 4(ia

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //