Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Bayer Abs Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Decided On : Jun-25-2003
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
LAW: Rule 173C, Rule 173C, Section 4, Section 2(h, Circular, Central Excise Act, Section 4, Section 2(2, Section 4, Section 4(1)(a, Section 4(ia, Section 4(ia
CARDINAL: 1, 39.03, 31.5.96, two, some 10 or 12, 1.6.99, 29.10.2001, 24.5.2000, 2, 53, 1, 180, 650, 155, 8, 14, 433, 5, 6.
ORG: House Hold Appliances, Computer Appliance, the Customers/Dealers, M/s. Mansuklal Vanmalidas &, Contract, Central Excise Authority, the Hon'ble Tribunal, Escorts JCB Ltd., CCE, 533/29/00-CX, Prabhat Zarda Factory Ltd., Board Circular, Central, the Range Office, Insurance Policy, the Central Excise Audit, The Apex Court, Escorts JCB Ltd., Central Excise, Civil, Revenue, Escort JCB Ltd., ELT, Tribunal, the Apex Court, VIP Industries Ltd., Customs &, the Supreme Court, ELT, Court, Union of India, Bombay Tyre International Ltd., Madras Rubber Factory Ltd., ELT, VIP Industries Ltd., Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court
DATE: the period October 1996, Oct 96 to June 2000, 29/10/2001, the period October, 1996 to June, 2000, five years, Oct '96 to June 2000, 1944, May 2000, May 2000, May 2000, 2002, 2001, 2003, 1944, 1983, 1896, 1995, 1944
ORDINAL: first, second, first, first
NORP: Central Excise
PERSON: MF
WORK_OF_ART: the Larger Bench of the Hon'ble Tribunal, Place of Removal
LOC: Range
GPE: S.C., S.C., S.C., Govt, India, S.C.
PRODUCT: Central Excise
EVENT: Section 4(ia