Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Raymond Limited Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.
Decided On : Feb-20-2003
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
LAW: Rule 57F(4, Rule 57F, Section 11A, Rule 57-I(4, Section 11 AC of the Act, the Central Excise Act, Section 3, the Customs Tariff Act, Section 3, Notification 29/96
CARDINAL: 1, 3-9-1996, 11-6-1999, 30-4-1999, 1, 11, 3-94996, 3-9-1996, 29/96, 3-9-1996, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 4, 4.5, 3-9-1996, 16/99, 16-3-1999, 4, 4
DATE: 1944, 1944, 1944, 1975, 1978, 1944, 1944, 1944, 1944
PERCENT: 10%
PERSON: Deemed, Notification, Shri Prakash Shah, Shri Uma Shankar
ORG: Central Excise, Modvat, Government, Counsel, the Central Excises, the Central Excises, the Mumbai Commissionerate
NORP: Rules, Rules
GPE: N.T.
PRODUCT: Para 5.2
MONEY: 40 per cent, 60 per cent
ORDINAL: fourth