Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Manohar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors
Decided On : Jan-16-2015
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 323, the Indian Penal Code, Section 326 IPC, Section 324 IPC, Section 323 IPC, Section 323, Section 323 IPC, Section 323 IPC, Section 323, Section 357 and 357- A., Section 357-A, Section 357(1, Section 357 CrPC, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357-A, Section 357, Section 357 CrPC, the Fatal Accidents Act, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357, Section 376 IPC, Section 357 Cr, Section 357 CrPC, Section 357(3, Section 357(3, Section 357(3
ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, CRL, the High Court, Court, Court, Mool Singh, |2, Udai, IPC, IPC, the Court of Sessions, the High Court, the Court of Sessions, the High Court, Court, Court, State, the Court of Sessions, the High Court, Court, Court, forearms.8, State, Hon'ble High Court, breadwinner.94, The United Nations Commission of Human, State, Court, CrPC, Court, Court, Court, Kotak Mahindra Co. Ltd., Court, Court, Court, Victim Restitution, Procedural Analysis, State, Court, State, State, District Legal Services Authority, the Law Commission of India, Court, Julius, Bishop, Oxford, Court, Court, Court, State, A.P. v., Polamala Raju, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, Haryana, Criminal Appeal, Court, Court, State or Union Territory, The States of Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, National Judicial Academy
DATE: 2012, 23rd November, 2011, 2009, 29th October, 1980, |four years, one year, one month, three months, 35 years, recent years, 1988, 31, 1978, 1994, 1995, 1132, 2007, 2007, the mid-1960s, the decades, 1984, 2008, 2008, 1994, 1996, 1880, 1874-80, 2000, 1284, 10 years', 5 years, 2010, 2010, 28th November, 2014, observed:-"4, one month, Rs.50,000/-, two months, three months, 2015, 1998, 2013, 2010
PERSON: GOEL, PW-5- Manohar Singh, Devi Singh PW-4, Maan Singh PW-11, Karan Singh, Jaswant Singh, |Convicted, Sentence Imposed, RI, |son, |Chotu Singh, RI, Karan Singh, Devi Singh, Maan Singh, Devi Singh, compensated.10, Victim, A.P. Modi, compensation.12, Shivaji Gaikwad, Hari Singh v. Sukhbir Singh, SCC, SCC, Balraj, SCC, Baldev Singh v. State of Punjab, SCC, Dilip S. Dahanukar v., Dilip S. Dahanukar, para 38)"8, Harvard Law Review, Cr, Hari Singh, Bench, Maya Devi v. Raj Kumari Batra, Anr, Sabu Joseph, J.(T.S. THAKUR, J.(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
NORP: J.1
CARDINAL: As many as 13, 11, one, 11, one, two, two, three, 4, as many as 10, 1, 2.5, 0.5, one, One, two, 4, 984, 557-58, 10)"0, 1, 4, 549, 4, 823, 6, 6, 3, 209, 545, one, one, 3, 154th, 357, 1, 3, 5, 222-23, 7 SCC75:2000, three, 78-79, 9, 11, 3, 842, 495, 28, 66, 1, 6, 6, 7
GPE: question.3, Nos.2, Singh, Singh, Rs.1,000/-, Singh, Singh, Singh, Singh, Singh, Gujarat, Sarwan, Singh v. State of Punjab, owner.50, the State of Kerala, Telangana, K.A., NEW DELHI
QUANTITY: three | | |, three | | |, 6 cm x 4 cm, 8 cm x 2 cm, 8 cm x 2 cm, 10 cm x 2 cm, 15 cm x 2 cm, 1 cm x 1 cm, 3 x 1 cm, 8 cm x 0.5
PRODUCT: Rs.2,000/-, 323, Sections 357, Suresh
ORDINAL: first, second, first
WORK_OF_ART: Basic Principles and Guidelines
FAC: 152nd
EVENT: 9 &11
TIME: 9 SCC486: