Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Montreaux Resorts P. Ltd and Ors. Vs. Sonia Khosla and Ors.

Decided On : Jan-13-2015

Court : Delhi

LAW: Constitution, Section 11, section 2(c)(i, Section 340 Cr, Article 226, Article 226, Article 144 of the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, The Constitution of India, Article 129, Article 215, Constitution, Article 19(1, Article 19(2, Article 19(1, Article 129 or Article 215, the Constitution Bench

DATE: November, 2014, on:13, January, 2015, 2008, 04.01.2012, 24.04.2012.10, 28.01.2009, today, 13.11.2009, 2009, 29.01.2010, 2009, 1996, 17.12.2009, 2009, today, four weeks, today, today, 2012, 20.07.2012, that day, 24th April, 2012, 24th April, 2012, May, 2013, 24th September, 2012, today, 22nd November, 2013, LPA16of 2014, today, Today, 2014, 1971, 30.12.2008, 29.10.2009, 2007, 15.10.2009, 20.03.2009, the last date, today, today, two working days, today, today, every month, today, 04.01.2012, 01204334365, 23.12.2011, 1234, 04.01.2012, 2008, 67, 30 th September, 2006, 4th January, 2012, 4th January, 2012, 19.09.2012, 24.04.2012, January, 2012, 21.08.2014, 04.01.2012, 04.01.2012, Four weeks, four weeks, 21.08.2014, one week, the year 2008, 2009, 2009, 2009, 11595 of 2008, 29.01.2010 IA1011of 2010, 2009 10,000, 2010, 2009 10,000, 2009 25,000, 2009, 10., 2010, OMP660of 2009 25,000, 2009 10,000 12, 2010, OMP660of 2009 5,000 13, 2009, 2010, 2012, OMP613of 2010 20,000, 2010, 2008, 2013, 2012 51, 2012, 12.08.2010, 21.08.2014, 2009, 2008, 28.01.2009, 2007, 2010, OMP660of 2009, 2014, LPA16of 2012, 2014, LPA583of 2014, 24.04.2012, 4th January, 2012, 1999, 1998, 1991, 1995, 1998, 1998, 1998, 1998, 2002, 1995, 1996, 1314, 1974, 1971, 1000, 1978, 34748, 1941, 1978, 1978, 1893, 1893, 2003, 1955, 1955, 1996, 1991, 60203, 2007, 1974, 1973, 1973, 14, 1970

ORG: CAS, MONTREAUX RESORTS P. LTD & ORS, this High Court, the Company Law Board, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, the Supreme Court, changed.8, Court, the High Court, Court, the Division Bench, the Supreme Court, Order, Court, Court, Respondents, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Respondents, the Company Court, Court, the Division Bench, Review Petition, Court, SLP, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, SLP, Respondents, inter alia, R.V. Easwar, Justice R.V. Easwar, Justice R.V. Easwar, Justice R.V. Easwar, Court, R.V. Easwar, Division Bench, Bench, Court, LPA5832014, Court, the Contempts of Court Act, Order, the Company Law Board, the Registrar General, Court, Company Law Board, Monterex Private Limited, Respondents, the High Court, Respondents, Criminal Contempt, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supreme Court, this Arbitral Tribunal, Metropolitan Magistrate, Advocate, Court, CrPC, Metropolitan Magistrate, Supreme Court, D.P. Chadha Vs, Delhi High Court, U/s 362 CrPC, Magistrate, Magistrate, Hon’ble Supreme Court, Santa Singh Vs State of Punjab, Metropolitan Magistrate, Advocate, CC No.2/14, CAS, Metropolitan Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, CMM, CMM, CC No.64/1, CMM, CMM, Court, Court, Court, Registrar General, Registrar Vigilance, Sony, Court, Court, Court, under:“1, R.P.No.788/2011, Court, Registrar Vigilance, Court, SONY, LG Mobile Phone, HP Pavilion Laptop, Court, Court, Court, System, Court, the HP Pavilion, LG Mobile, No.9953096650, the HP Pavilion, LG P500, SONY, SONY, LG Mobile, Court, Court, Court, Court, Contempt of Courts, Court, Court, LPA, the Bakshi Group, the Khosla Group, Court, The Khosla Group, Bakshi Group, the Bakshi Group, The Khosla Group, Khosla Group, Bakshi Group, AGM, the Bakshi Group, the High Court, District Courts, the High Court, the High Court, the District Courts, the Supreme Court or Courts, The High Court, Court, Respondents, the High Court, the District Courts, the Supreme Court, Respondents, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, Show Cause Notice, the Show Cause Notice, the Show Cause Notice, The Single Bench, Court, the Division Bench, the Division Bench, Registry, the Bar Council of Karnataka (Enrolment No, Bar Council of India, the Bar Council of Karnataka, LPA, the Show Cause Notice, Court, Bar Council of India, record.50, Registry, CAS, Crl M.A., Arbitral, Cont Cas, Cont Cas, CONT, CAS, Registry, Registry, Court, SB, Company Law Board, Court, CCP, the High Court, Court, Madhya Pradesh High Court, CRI, Court, Court, Court, SCC248the Supreme Court of, Court, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, Court, the High Court, Court, Bar, Bar, the High Court, Court, Bar, Court, Court, SCC584 this Court, Supreme Court Bar Assn, Union of India, Court, the Bar Council of the State or, Bar Council of India, Solicitor General, the Bar Council of India, the Bar Council of the State or, Bar Council of India, the High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, The Bar Council, the Supreme Court, Court, the Bar Council, the Bar Council, Court, Supreme Court Bar Assn, Union of India, Bar Council of India, The Supreme Court, Court, State, the Contempt of Courts Act, J.In Pennekamp, Orissa High Court, Court, 3rd Edn, Act, the Privy Council, Court, the Star Chamber, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the Contempt of Courts Act, Justice, Court, Court, The Indian Express, the Supreme Court Judges, the Judges of the Court, the Chief Justice of India, High Courts, inter alia, The Indian Express, Court, Registrar, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Bench, Justice Black, the Los Angeles Times, Court, Court, P. Shiv Shanker, AC138 this Court, the Bar Council, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Justice, Court, The Supreme Court of India, Bar, Court, Magistrate, the High Court, Court, the Common Pleas, Crown, Parliament, The Supreme Court, under:“1, State, AC, Hidayatullah, Cooper v. Union of India, Court

PERSON: Raman Kapur, Anand M. Mishra, Versus SONIA KHOSLA & ORS, Deepak, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Order, Order, Deepak Khosla, Order, Order, Deepak Khosla, Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Sonia Khosla, Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Order, Deepak Khosla, Sonia Khosla, Order, Arb, Deepak Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Arb, Justice Manmohan, Deepak Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Order, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Khosla, Khosla, Bench, Order, Suo motu, Bench, Deepak Khosla, Hindi, Sanjeev Khanna, J., J., Bench, Deepak Khosla, Sanjeev Khanna, R. V. Easwar, Dedh Bench, R. V. Easwar, Deepak Khosla, Sanjeev Khanna, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Sanjeev Khanna, J., Deepak Khosla, Order, Bench, Deepak Khosla, Order, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Khosla, Shri Deepak Khosla, Sonia Khosla Vs, V.N. Sharma, Bench Officer, Order, Deepak Khosla, Sonia Khosla, R.P. Khosla, Khosla, Order, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Order, Deepak, Narayan Mishra, Deepak Khosla, Satte Vs, Kumar, Nirmala Vs, Pawan, Deepak Khosla, Bench, Registrar Vigilance, Mobile Phone, Deepak, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak, Deepak Khosla, Sarsij Kumar, Zameen Ahmed, Girish Sharma, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Registrar Computerisation, Deepak Khosla, Bench, Shri Ajay Gupta, Smt, Ravinder Bedi, Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Vikram Bakshi, Vikram Bakshi, Vikram Bakshi, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Order, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, KAR12802013, Deepak Khosla, Deepak, Petitioner, Deepak Khosla, Co.A., Cont Cas, Cont Cas, Cont Cas, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Deepak Khosla, Cont Cas, Co.A., C. Ref, Deepak Khosla, Cont Cas, Cont Cas, Lalit Mohan Das, Orissa, Munsif, M.B. Sanghi v. High Court, Ahmadi, Chandra Mishra, Brazenness, Chandra Mishra, Angelic Judges, Shri Shanti Bhushan, Baradakanta Mishra v. Registrar, Krishna Iyer, Palekar, para 65)“65, Krishna Iyer, J., S. Mulgaokar, SCC, Krishna Iyer, Gandhi, Frankfurter, Bridges, L Ed 192, SCC, D.C. Saxena, SCC, AC138, Atkin, Andre Paul Terence Ambard, LJ671, Bharucha, J.in, Atkin, MOHAN LAL V. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, Shareef, Cri LJ133, Shareef, Cri LJ133, Sualal Yadav, Shamsher Singh Bedi, M.B. Sanghi, Edward Coke, Morris, para 6)“6

NORP: J.1, American, Canadian, olympian, Indian, British

CARDINAL: one, 32, One, 24.04.2012, 19.09.2012, 25.09.2008, 12, 7, 13.9, 12, two, 14, 15, 660, 29.01.2010, 29.01.2010, 16, 22.02.2011, 17, 28.03.2014, one, One, 11.10.2013, one, one, One and half, one, 25.04.2014, 19, 9, 2, 3, 29.10.2009, two, three, one, 4.2.2009, 23, one, 24, No.2, 10, 25, 26, 23.12.2014, 27, 22.12.2011, 15.12.2011, more than 20, one, 28, 22.12.2011, one, 22.12.2011, 04:00PM, 04:30PM, two, six, two, 12, 13, 29.15, 24.04.2012, as many as 8, as many as 16, 14, 67, one, two, 24.04.2012, 31, 24.04.2012, 24.04.2012, 4, 21.08.2014, 73, 24.04.2012, 24.04.2012.39, 73, 73, 21.08.2014, 21.08.2014, 14.10.2014, 17.11.2014, 24.04.2012, 17.11.2014, 21.08.2014, 17.11.2014, 25,000, 2, 29.05.2009, 25,000, 3, 29.05.2009, 25,000, 4, 29.05.2009, 25,000, one, 5, 13.11.2009, 10,000, 6, 29.01.2010, 9, 25,000, 11, 17.01.2011, 190, 25,000, 14, 24, 2, 17, 20,000, 18, 165, 20,000, 19, 28.03.2014, 25,000, 25.04.2014, 21, 959, 18.07.2014, 2, 15, 229, 28.03.2014, 28.11.2014, 9, 7, 24, 28, 29, 3, 602, 2, 616, 37, 33, 4, 3, 444, 79)“79, 34, 4, 3, 3, more than half, 2, 6, 90, 328, 16, 1, 128, 8, 7, 9, three, two, 403, 403, 409, three, 3, 403, 350, 23)“23, two, 363, 56)“56, 314, 263, 86, 21, 3, 403, 247, 40)“40, 28, 3, 403, 244, 34)“34, 30, one, 145-46, two, 59, 3, 1, 1, 181, 3, 60, 14, 13, 3, 3, 66f, 2, 301

GPE: India, chamber.10, R.P., Cont, C.P., CP, Dasti, Ld, Ld, Ld, Ld, Ld, Ld, P.C., Delhi, Delhi, the State of Karnataka, the State of Karnataka.44, dismissed.46, CONT, SB, Co.A., Co.A., Co.A., B.R., India, court.25, Vinay, India, ARUNDHATI, under:“1, Vinay, Florida, Judges, Judges, India, Halsbury, Vol, Judges, Judges, the People of India, California, Judges, P.N., Judges, Judges, Judges, Trinidad, Judges

LOC: Single Judge, Single, Single, South, South, South, South, South, Single, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, L J4223has, Respondent

PRODUCT: Bench, CA No.1000/2000, CA No.671/2008, No.1, Respondent, Bench, Bench, Bench, Court.33, Respondent, Respondent, SCC466, Bench, AC273

FAC: the Show Cause Notice, Co.A.(SB, the Show Cause Notice, the Show Cause Notice, D.C. Saxena, Rustom Cowasjee

WORK_OF_ART: Bench, Bench, a Show Cause Notice, Show Cause Notice, Civil or Criminal, Road to Justice

ORDINAL: firstly, third, first, third, first, third, Secondly, first

TIME: Several hours, 2 PM for 05.11.2014, 45 minutes, 04.17 PM, 04.32 PM, half an hour, 4.45 PM, half an hour, around 3.40 pm, 4.00 p.m., 4.20 pm, 4.30 pm, 5 pm, the minutes

PERCENT: 18%

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English, English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //