Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd.
Decided On : Dec-15-2014
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 86, the Finance Act, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, the Central Excise Act, the Finance Act, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, Section 35, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, Section 35, Section 86(2, the Finance Act, Section 86, the Finance Act, Section 73, Section 86, the Finance Act, Section 86, the Finance Act, Section 73 or, Section 85, section 73, section 85, Section 86(2, the Finance Act, Section 86, the Finance Act, Section 86, the Finance Act
MONEY: ~9
DATE: December 15, 2014 +, 1994?.”2, 20th March, 2014, 1990, 2012, 4th February, 2007, 7th January and 8th January, 2008, 1944, 1994, 1944, 23rd November, 2012, 1944, 2013, 1944, 1994, 1994, 85, 1994, 1994, 83A, 02.11.2012, 1994, 1994, 2013, 20th March, 2014, 2014, 1994, 1944, 2014
PERSON: Sonia Sharma, Neha Sharma, J.K.Mittal, Rajveer Singh, Swapna Jumde, SANJIV KHANNA, JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, L.R. Sharma, L.R., Berger Paints, Pal, Delhi, Superintendent, Notification No.25/2005-C.E., Berger, Devson Steels, SANJIV KHANNA
ORG: JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD, the Commissioner of Service Tax, the Custom Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Committee of the Chief Commissioners, Tribunal, Commissioner of Service Tax, Court, Court, CESTAT, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Collector of Central Excise, Court, Kundalia Industries, under:“4, CESTAT, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Commissioner (Appeals, the Committee of Commissioners of Central Excise, the Committee of Commissioners, the Committee of Commissioners, Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, the High Court, Kundalia Industries, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Circular, Kundalia Industries, Court, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Committee of Chief Commissioners, Court, Kundalia, ITC Limited, the Allahabad High Court, Kundalia Industries, Kundalia Industries, Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, Tribunal, Sub Section, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, 2)The Committee of Chief Commissioners, the Appellate Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners, Central Excise, Board, the Appellate Tribunal, The Committee of Commissioners, Central Excise (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, the Committee of Commissioners, Central Excise (Appeals, Central Excise (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, xxx”8, L.R. Sharma & Co, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Division Bench, Sub-Section, Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, the Allahabad High Court, the Division Bench, Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, Reliance, the Allahabad High Court, Customs, Central Excise & Service, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, SubSection, the Committee of Chief Commissioners, the Committee of Chief Commissioners, J.V., RAO
CARDINAL: 1, 2, two, two, 2, 3, 279, 351, 15-10-2007, 5, two, two, two, 5, 12, 290, two, 2, 2A, 2, 2A, 2, 2A, 1, 2A, 2, 2A, 290, 301, two, 1, 2, 2A, 2
GPE: L.R., No.7, W.P.(C, No.6918/2012
LOC: Respondent
ORDINAL: second
NORP: Central Excise, Central Excise
WORK_OF_ART: effect:“3
FAC: Commissioner(s