Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd.

Decided On : Dec-15-2014

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 86, the Finance Act, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, the Central Excise Act, the Finance Act, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, Section 35, Section 86(2, Section 86(2, Section 35, Section 86(2, the Finance Act, Section 86, the Finance Act, Section 73, Section 86, the Finance Act, Section 86, the Finance Act, Section 73 or, Section 85, section 73, section 85, Section 86(2, the Finance Act, Section 86, the Finance Act, Section 86, the Finance Act

MONEY: ~9

DATE: December 15, 2014 +, 1994?.”2, 20th March, 2014, 1990, 2012, 4th February, 2007, 7th January and 8th January, 2008, 1944, 1994, 1944, 23rd November, 2012, 1944, 2013, 1944, 1994, 1994, 85, 1994, 1994, 83A, 02.11.2012, 1994, 1994, 2013, 20th March, 2014, 2014, 1994, 1944, 2014

PERSON: Sonia Sharma, Neha Sharma, J.K.Mittal, Rajveer Singh, Swapna Jumde, SANJIV KHANNA, JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, L.R. Sharma, L.R., Berger Paints, Pal, Delhi, Superintendent, Notification No.25/2005-C.E., Berger, Devson Steels, SANJIV KHANNA

ORG: JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD, the Commissioner of Service Tax, the Custom Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Committee of the Chief Commissioners, Tribunal, Commissioner of Service Tax, Court, Court, CESTAT, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Collector of Central Excise, Court, Kundalia Industries, under:“4, CESTAT, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Commissioner (Appeals, the Committee of Commissioners of Central Excise, the Committee of Commissioners, the Committee of Commissioners, Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, the High Court, Kundalia Industries, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Circular, Kundalia Industries, Court, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Committee of Chief Commissioners, Court, Kundalia, ITC Limited, the Allahabad High Court, Kundalia Industries, Kundalia Industries, Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, Tribunal, Sub Section, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, 2)The Committee of Chief Commissioners, the Appellate Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners, Central Excise, Board, the Appellate Tribunal, The Committee of Commissioners, Central Excise (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, the Committee of Commissioners, Central Excise (Appeals, Central Excise (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, xxx”8, L.R. Sharma & Co, CESTAT, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Division Bench, Sub-Section, Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, the Allahabad High Court, the Division Bench, Tribunal, the Committee of Chief Commissioners/ Commissioners, Reliance, the Allahabad High Court, Customs, Central Excise & Service, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, SubSection, the Committee of Chief Commissioners, the Committee of Chief Commissioners, J.V., RAO

CARDINAL: 1, 2, two, two, 2, 3, 279, 351, 15-10-2007, 5, two, two, two, 5, 12, 290, two, 2, 2A, 2, 2A, 2, 2A, 1, 2A, 2, 2A, 290, 301, two, 1, 2, 2A, 2

GPE: L.R., No.7, W.P.(C, No.6918/2012

LOC: Respondent

ORDINAL: second

NORP: Central Excise, Central Excise

WORK_OF_ART: effect:“3

FAC: Commissioner(s

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //