Semantic Analysis by spaCy
United Chemie Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Decided On : Jun-19-1986
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: S. 11-A of the Act
CARDINAL: 1, 5,00,000/-, 23,27,519.36, 29, about 15-4-1985, 28, 29, 5,00,000/-, 5, 29, 23,27,519.36, 31-3-1985, 27,04,000/-, 20-3-1986, 21-3-1985.3, 29, 1-10-1982, 13-3-1986, 17, 37, 236, 27, 5.11, 1-10-1982, 12, 27, one, 6, one, one, 16, 126, 11-10-1982, 31-3-1985, 23,03,299/-, 32,54,5671-, 2k, 31-3-1986, 1, 5,00,000/-, 23,27,519.36, 5,00,000/-, 2
PERSON: S.35 F, S. 35(F
DATE: 1944, the years 1978-79, 79-80, 80-81, 1982, 19-7-1985, 2-9-1985, 1982, R.T. 12, the year ending, all the years, 19-7-1985, the years 1978-79, 1979-80, 1980-81, 2 months 18 days, the years, the day, 1984, the year ending, the year ending, eight weeks
LOC: Superintendent, Superintendent
ORG: the Customs, Excise &, Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, the Tribunal Rules, the Collector of Central Excise, Tribunal, Tribunal, Income Tax, Tribunal, Income Tax and Wealth Tax, the Collector of Central Excise, Suffice, Tribunal, ELT, Aminchand Pyarelal v., Bench
ORDINAL: first, 4he
WORK_OF_ART: the Paper Book, Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh
NORP: Central Excise, hardship".6
PRODUCT: Central Excise
GPE: Ks