Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Bihar Sugar Mills Assn. and Ors. Vs. Uoi and Ors.
Decided On : Dec-24-2014
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 3, the Essential Commodities Act, Section 3, the Essential Commodities Act, Section 3, the EC Act, Order i.e. Sugar, Section 3, the EC Act, the EC Act, the EC Act, the Essential Commodities Act, the Essential Commodities Act, the EC Act
GPE: NEW DELHI +, P.S., Sugar, Malaprabha, Malprabha, Malaprabha, Malaprabha, Malaprabha, Malaprabha, Malaprabha-III
CARDINAL: 12.2014, 12.2014, 19.12.2001, 28.11.1974, 3C, 3C, 22.09.1993, 3C, 22.02.1995, 6/1995, 122-123/1981, 28.01.1997, 1966.5, 13.04.1999, 12.07.1975, 8, 11.07.1975, 28.01.1997, 3C, 16.11.2000, 28.11.1974, two, 13.04.1999, two, 12.07.1975, 28.11.1974, 16.11.2000, 12.07.1975, 12.07.1975, 12.07.1975, 28.11.1974, 11.07.1975, 9, 9
PERSON: Jayant Bhushan, Kumar Rajesh Singh, Praveen Kumar, Punam Singh, Sanjeev Narula, Ajay Kalra, CHIEF JUSTICE1, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Order, Amendment Order, Notification, Amendment Order, W.P.(C, Shri Jayant Bhushan, Sanjeev Narula, Notification, Emphasis Supplied, Notification, Notification
ORG: Versus UOI & ORS, Standing Counsel, the Government of India, Department of Food and Public Distribution, the Government of India, the Government of India, Order, the Supreme Court, Shri Malaprabha Cooperative Sugar Factory Ltd., v. Union of India & Anr, the Supreme Court, the Government of India, the Government of India, C.A. Nos, the Supreme Court, Malprabha, the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Government of India, the Supreme Court, Contempt Petition, the Supreme Court, Indian Sugar Mills Association, the Supreme Court, the Government of India by Notification, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Contempt Petition, Government, Malprabha, the Union of India, the Government of India, the Sugar Cane Control Order, the Supreme Court, the Union of India, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government, the Sugarcane Control Order, Court, the Government of India, the Contempt Petition, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Contempt Petitions holding:“This Court, Court, Government, the Supreme Court, the Contempt Petition, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, Malaprabha-III).18, the Contempt Petition, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Union of India, the Sugar Control Order and Section 3(3C, kks/anb
LOC: Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge
DATE: 08.05.2003, 1974-75, 13.04.1999, 1974-75, 1974-75, 1955, the year 1974-75, 1955, 1974-75, 1974, 26.11.1974, 1974-75, 1979-80, 1994 1 SCC648(hereinafter, 1966, 1955, 1975, 1997 10, 1974-75, 1999, 1974-75, 13.04.1999, 12.07.1975, 19.12.2001, Malaprabha-II, 13.04.1999, 12.07.1975, 13.04.1999, 1974-75, Section 3(3C, 1974-75, introduced.11, 22.02.1995, 1974-75, 12.07.1975, 22.02.1995, 22.02.1995, 1966, 13.04.1999, the year 1974-75, Malaprabha-II, Section 3(3C, 13, 12.07.1975, 1974-75.15, 13.04.1999, 12.07.1975, 1974-75, 11.07.1975, 1992, 11.07.1975, 22.02.1995, Malaprabha-II, the entire sugar, 1974-75, 13.04.1999
PRODUCT: Notifications, Notifications
MONEY: 50 per cent, 12.07.1975 and (ii
NORP: West U.P.
TIME: 12.07.1975 i.e.