Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Shri Shambhu Nath and Shri Lal Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Lucknow
Decided On : Jun-01-2001
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: Section 112(b, Section 110, the Customs Act, Section 11(d, Section 107, the Customs Act, Section 108 of the Act, Section 135, Section 104 of the Act, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 3 the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, Section 123 of the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 123 of the Customs Act, Section 107, the Customs Act, Section 123(2, the Customs Act, Section 123, Section 107, Section 123(2, the Customs Act, Section 123, Section 123(1, Section 123 of the Act, Section 123, Section 123, Section 123 of the Customs Act, Section 110 of the Act, Section 123(1, section 123(1
CARDINAL: 1, 25,000/-, 24.12.99, three, 101, 10,12,013/-, three, 25.12.99, three, 25.12.99, three, 23.8.2000, 20,000/-, 25,000/-, 40, 461].5, 108, 108, 7.7.2000, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1
ORG: Customs, Safedabad, C/11/2001, the Commissioner of Customs, SCN, Customs, Tribunal, Collector of Customs, CJM, SCN, Customs, SCN, Shambhu Nath's, SCN, inter alia, Collins English Dictionary, Customs, Customs, SCN, Tribunal, Customs, Customs, The Additional Collector, Tribunal, Customs, Bench, Customs, Registry
WORK_OF_ART: Maruti Gypsy'
FAC: the Barabanki-Lucknow, Departmental
PERSON: Raj Kumar Sharma, Shambu Nath, Lal Bahadur, Lucknow, Shambu, Lal Bahadur, Shambu Nath, Lal Bahadur, Naveen Mullick, Shrenik J. Kothari &, Jayanand J. Kothari Vs, JDR, S. Kumar, Kotharis, Kotharis, S.J. Kothari, Kotharis, Kotharis, Bench, Bench, Kotharis, Kotharis
GPE: C/7/2001, India, India, Nepal, India, Nepal, India, Nepal, Nepal, India, India, Nepal, India, India, India
PERCENT: 70%, 47-64%, 70%, 70%, 70%, 47.1 to 64%, 70%, 70%
NORP: SCN, Indian, contra, Hon'ble, Hon'ble
DATE: 1962
LOC: Madras