Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shri Shambhu Nath and Shri Lal Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Lucknow

Decided On : Jun-01-2001

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Section 112(b, Section 110, the Customs Act, Section 11(d, Section 107, the Customs Act, Section 108 of the Act, Section 135, Section 104 of the Act, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 3 the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, Section 123 of the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 123 of the Customs Act, Section 107, the Customs Act, Section 123(2, the Customs Act, Section 123, Section 107, Section 123(2, the Customs Act, Section 123, Section 123(1, Section 123 of the Act, Section 123, Section 123, Section 123 of the Customs Act, Section 110 of the Act, Section 123(1, section 123(1

CARDINAL: 1, 25,000/-, 24.12.99, three, 101, 10,12,013/-, three, 25.12.99, three, 25.12.99, three, 23.8.2000, 20,000/-, 25,000/-, 40, 461].5, 108, 108, 7.7.2000, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1

ORG: Customs, Safedabad, C/11/2001, the Commissioner of Customs, SCN, Customs, Tribunal, Collector of Customs, CJM, SCN, Customs, SCN, Shambhu Nath's, SCN, inter alia, Collins English Dictionary, Customs, Customs, SCN, Tribunal, Customs, Customs, The Additional Collector, Tribunal, Customs, Bench, Customs, Registry

WORK_OF_ART: Maruti Gypsy'

FAC: the Barabanki-Lucknow, Departmental

PERSON: Raj Kumar Sharma, Shambu Nath, Lal Bahadur, Lucknow, Shambu, Lal Bahadur, Shambu Nath, Lal Bahadur, Naveen Mullick, Shrenik J. Kothari &, Jayanand J. Kothari Vs, JDR, S. Kumar, Kotharis, Kotharis, S.J. Kothari, Kotharis, Kotharis, Bench, Bench, Kotharis, Kotharis

GPE: C/7/2001, India, India, Nepal, India, Nepal, India, Nepal, Nepal, India, India, Nepal, India, India, India

PERCENT: 70%, 47-64%, 70%, 70%, 70%, 47.1 to 64%, 70%, 70%

NORP: SCN, Indian, contra, Hon'ble, Hon'ble

DATE: 1962

LOC: Madras

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //