Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/S. Mihijam Vanaspati Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Decided On : Jan-03-2001

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

LAW: the Essential Commodities Act, Packaged Commodities Act

CARDINAL: 1, 7,54,909.27, 25,000.00, 10/96, 23.7.96, 1998(99, 8, 8, 1999(110, 6, 23.7.96.7, 23.7.96, 22.7.96

PERSON: Notification, Controller, Notification No.10/96-CE, Notification No.10/96, Upto 22.7.96, Tin Containers, Vanaspati, Notification No.16/96-CE, Notification No.67/95, Notification

ORG: Central Excise Duty, the Metal Containers, S.D.R., Metal Containers, the Commissioner (Appeals, Union of India, V.M.Salgaoncar and Brothers, P) Ltd., Supreme Court, K.T.Kosalram (Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, an Import Licence, the Tin Container, Central Excise Duty, Central Excise Duty, the Central Government, Central Excise Duty, the Budget Speech, Parliament, intent.10

GPE: Vanaspati, Vanaspati, Vanaspati, Vanaspati, Vanaspati, Vanaspati, Vanaspati, Vanaspati, Vanaspati, Vanaspati

WORK_OF_ART: Shri S.K.Bagaria, Notification No.10/96-CE, Notification No.10/96 to Metal Containers

DATE: 1955, 1996

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //