intertec Vs. Cce - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Nov-23-2000

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

CARDINAL: 1, four, 1/93, 28.2.93, 2, three, 1/93, 1/93, 4, two, 32, 256, more than one, one, 1/93, 40, 1/93, 1/93, 1/93, 1, 1, 15.5.96, one, 1/93, one, 1/93, 28.2.93

ORG: M/s.Intertec, Appellants, M/s. Interarch Building Products Pvt. Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, Order, M/s. Interarch Building Products Pvt, Jaina Detergent P. Ltd., CCE, Allahabad, Kamrup Industrial Gases Ltd., C.C.E., Allahabad, Tribunal, the Larger Bench, Franko Italian Co. Put.Ltd., CCE, RLT 295, SDR, Appellate Authority, Fabric, the Larger Bench, S.D.R., The Commissioner (Appeals, the declaration/ Annexure-II, Appellants, Clause, Tribunal, Chacko, Bench, Bench, Faridabad Tools Pvt. Ltd.

NORP: Central Excise, Franco Italian, Hon'ble

WORK_OF_ART: Vertical Blinds of Textiles, TRAC/TRAC Luxury Window Covering, a Larger Bench

PERSON: Shri G. Shivdas, Notification, Appellants, Shri K.K. Goel, Appellants, Order, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Order, Appellants, Notification, Shri PG, Bench, Bench, Bench

GPE: Ld, Mumbai, Ld

DATE: 1999, a financial year, a financial year, a financial year

PRODUCT: Para 4

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly

FAC: Kamrup Industrial Gases, Kamrup Industrial Gases