Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Precision Engineering and Vs. the Collector of Customs

Decided On : Mar-17-1983

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 129-A of the Customs Act

CARDINAL: 1, two, two, 1,32,843.75, 74,104.82, 8, 2, one, 1975.The, 25,000/-, two

ORG: un, Customs, Advocate, the AM-82 Policy, O.G.L., Advocate, Chartered Engineers', Customs, Telex, Engineers, the Chartered Engineers, the Chartered Engineers, Chartered Engineers, Customs, the Chartered Engineers, The Chartered Engineers, Customs, the Import Control Regulations, Customs, the Chartered Engineers, the Custom Expert Appraiser, Advocate, the Customs, Shri Gidwani, the Chartered Engineers, ITC, the Add., Engineer, The Chartered Engineers, ITC

GPE: Bombay, Karnataka, Custom, India

ORDINAL: second, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, first, second

LOC: Govt

DATE: between 1970 and 1975, about 8 months, September, 74, December, 73, between 1970, the year, 1970, the two years, the year, 1975, The year, the past 10 years, 1970-75, more than 10 years old

PERSON: Addl, Addl, Shri Gidwani, Shri Gidwani, Addl

NORP: Indian

PERCENT: 10%, about 50%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //