Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Raj Kumar Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Decided On : Feb-10-2000
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: the Customs Act, Section 112(b, Section 112(b).2, Shri Raj, Section 112(b, the Customs Act
CARDINAL: 1, 5, two, 233.95, six, 10, 40,000, Five, 1962.7, 25.5.95, 5, 25.9.95, 25.9.95
ORG: the Commissioner of Customs, the Customs (Prev, the National Highway between, Bhairaw Nepal, Bajrang Transport, Khari Baoli, Department, Shri Sanwar Mall, Department, Department, Shri Sanwar Mall, Shri Sanwar Mall, DIG, Department, JDR, Bench
DATE: 12.9.97.The, 1962, 7521
GPE: Lucknow, Sitapur, Nepal, Delhi, Ld, Nepal, India, Nepal, India, Nepal, India, Nepal, China, Oil Mills, Nepal, Nepal, India, Nepal, India, Nepal, Counsel, Ld
NORP: Indian, Nepalese, Nepalese, Nepalese, Nepalese, Indian, Chinese, Nepalese, Nepalese, Nepalese, Nepalese, Chinese
WORK_OF_ART: Shri Raj
PERSON: Kumar Gupta, Shri Guru, Singh Driver, Kumar Gupta, Naveen Mullick, Kedar Rice, Shri Sanwar Mall, JDR Shri P. Ravinder Babu, Krishna Nagar, Nepal, Kedar Rice Dal, Shri Raj, Kumar Gupta, Shri Guru, Singh, Shri Raj, Kumar Gupta
ORDINAL: Third, Third, Third, Third, Third, Third, third, third