Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Raj Kumar Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Decided On : Feb-10-2000

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: the Customs Act, Section 112(b, Section 112(b).2, Shri Raj, Section 112(b, the Customs Act

CARDINAL: 1, 5, two, 233.95, six, 10, 40,000, Five, 1962.7, 25.5.95, 5, 25.9.95, 25.9.95

ORG: the Commissioner of Customs, the Customs (Prev, the National Highway between, Bhairaw Nepal, Bajrang Transport, Khari Baoli, Department, Shri Sanwar Mall, Department, Department, Shri Sanwar Mall, Shri Sanwar Mall, DIG, Department, JDR, Bench

DATE: 12.9.97.The, 1962, 7521

GPE: Lucknow, Sitapur, Nepal, Delhi, Ld, Nepal, India, Nepal, India, Nepal, India, Nepal, China, Oil Mills, Nepal, Nepal, India, Nepal, India, Nepal, Counsel, Ld

NORP: Indian, Nepalese, Nepalese, Nepalese, Nepalese, Indian, Chinese, Nepalese, Nepalese, Nepalese, Nepalese, Chinese

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Raj

PERSON: Kumar Gupta, Shri Guru, Singh Driver, Kumar Gupta, Naveen Mullick, Kedar Rice, Shri Sanwar Mall, JDR Shri P. Ravinder Babu, Krishna Nagar, Nepal, Kedar Rice Dal, Shri Raj, Kumar Gupta, Shri Guru, Singh, Shri Raj, Kumar Gupta

ORDINAL: Third, Third, Third, Third, Third, Third, third, third

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //