Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Carrier Aircon Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Decided On : Jan-25-2000
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: Section 35E(2, Chapter 84.18, Chapter Heading, Chapter Heading 8418, Tariff No, Tariff No, the Tariff No, chapter 84, Section 35E(2, Section 35E of the Central Excise Act
CARDINAL: 1, 84.18, 84.19, 84.15, 1., 84.18, 2, 84.18, 84.15, 8418.10, 7, more than one, 84.18", 67, 932, 69, 144, 107, 29, 107, 533, 29
ORG: Central Excise (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, the Commissioner (Appeals, SDR, the Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, the Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, C.E.I.B., Tariff, the Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner of Central Excise, Tribunal, Collector of Central Excise v. Sunita Textiles, Extrusion Processors v. Collector of Central Excise, Collector of Central Excise v. Eastern Aeromatics, Collector of Central Excise
GPE: Counsel, CETA
PERSON: Shri R. Krishnan, Shri R.K. Sharma, Schedule
DATE: 1985, 84.15, 84.15, 1993, 1993, 1999, 1998, 1999, 1998
MONEY: 84.15
PERCENT: 30%, 30%, only 18%
TIME: 84.18 i.e.
PRODUCT: 710