Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Carrier Aircon Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Decided On : Jan-25-2000

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Section 35E(2, Chapter 84.18, Chapter Heading, Chapter Heading 8418, Tariff No, Tariff No, the Tariff No, chapter 84, Section 35E(2, Section 35E of the Central Excise Act

CARDINAL: 1, 84.18, 84.19, 84.15, 1., 84.18, 2, 84.18, 84.15, 8418.10, 7, more than one, 84.18", 67, 932, 69, 144, 107, 29, 107, 533, 29

ORG: Central Excise (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, the Commissioner (Appeals, SDR, the Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, the Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, C.E.I.B., Tariff, the Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner of Central Excise, Tribunal, Collector of Central Excise v. Sunita Textiles, Extrusion Processors v. Collector of Central Excise, Collector of Central Excise v. Eastern Aeromatics, Collector of Central Excise

GPE: Counsel, CETA

PERSON: Shri R. Krishnan, Shri R.K. Sharma, Schedule

DATE: 1985, 84.15, 84.15, 1993, 1993, 1999, 1998, 1999, 1998

MONEY: 84.15

PERCENT: 30%, 30%, only 18%

TIME: 84.18 i.e.

PRODUCT: 710

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //