Jitendra Agarwal and Kay Cee Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Decided On : Nov-18-1999

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Chapter 74, the Modvat Scheme, Section 110, the Customs Act, the Central Excise Act, Rule 173Q, Section 209 A of the Central Excise Rules, Section 2, Section 110, the Customs Act, Rule 173, Rule 173Q

CARDINAL: 1, two, two, 2, 25-6-1997, 4264.25, 5, 76,000/-.The, 27-6-1997, 173, 1.25, 2, 1, 51, 173H, 2., 3., 4., 5., 635, 25, 4

ORG: Central Excise (Appeals, the Central Excise Department, Shri Jitender Agarwal, Bank Guarantee, Department, C/638/99-NB, The Lower Appellate Authority, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, Sulekh Ram, Sons v. Union of India, the High Court, Central Excise Duty, JDR, Bench, JDR, the Provisions of Rule 173, Form IV Register, the Form IV Register, JDR, JDR, Tribunal, the Form IV Register

PERSON: E/638/99-NB, Lakhs, Shri Jitender Agarwal, Shri Jitender Agarwal, Shri Navin Mullick, Arunachalam, JDR

DATE: 1985, 1962, 24-6-1997, today

EVENT: the Preventive Officers

PRODUCT: Central Excise, Rule 173Q, Rule 173Q, Central Excise Duty

NORP: Central Excise, Rules, Lakhs, Central Excise, Central Excise, Central Excise

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Jitender Agarwal