Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Chibramau Cold Storage Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Decided On : Mar-23-1984
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: Tariff Item No.29A(3, Rule 9, Item 3, Rule 9, Rule 9 and Rule 49, Rule 10
ORG: the Central Government, the Appellate Collector, the Allahabad High Court, Messrs U.P. Cold Storage, Mother India Refrigerating Industries Pvt. Ltd., SDR, the Gujarat High Court, Anil Ice Factory v. Union of India and Ors, the Central Excise Tariff, Punjab &, Haryana High Court, Frick India Ltd., the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, Allahabad, Hon'ble Allahabad High Court, Mother India Refrigerating Industries Pvt, the Supreme Court, the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue, the Gujarat High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, High Courts, AIR Andhra Pradesh-p., Andhra Cement Co. v.Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors, 1 Supreme Court, High Courts, Tariff Entry, Machinery, Ahmedabad v. Collector of Central Excise &, Customs, the Mother India Refrigerating Industries Pvt. Ltd., the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, Bench, AIR, Parliament, Parliament
FAC: Chibramau Cold Storage
GPE: Farrukhabad, Farrukhabad, Farrukhabad, G.S.R., valorem, valorem, valorem, Bombay, S.C.
EVENT: ' Cold Storage
DATE: 24-3-1976, 1980, 1980, 1944, 1984, 1984, 1984, 1976, 1973, 1984, 1970, 1950, 1982, 1976, six months
CARDINAL: three, 2500, 1, three, 12, 20, 5, 12, 20, 2, 600, 600).4, 49, 29(A)(3, 333, 29(AX3, 333, 20-2-1982, 333, 22-3-1984, 84, 446, 1., 2, 3., 1, 10/84, 333, 4
PERSON: Shri B.N. Bhattacharya, Shri V. Lakshmikumaran, Shri Lakshmikumaran, Baradakanta Mishra, Shri Bhimsen Dixit, Ravi Dughdhalaya, Bench, Bhattacharya, Shri Lakshmikumaran
TIME: 9 and Rule 49
WORK_OF_ART: 29A. Refrigerating and Air-conditioring
PERCENT: 20%, 20%, 30%
PRODUCT: Rule 9