Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Pu. Liansuama Vs. Wealth Tax Officer and ors.

Decided On : Jan-09-2002

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, section 14(2, Central Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Wealth Tax Act, Section 92, the Indian Constitution, Constitution, Article 371G of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 371-G of the Constitution, Article 371-G of the Constitution, Central Act, Constitution, Article 371-G of the Constitution., the Wealth Tax Act, the Income Tax Act 1961, the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, the Wealth Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Wealth Tax Act

ORG: P.G. Agarwal, the State of Mizoram, the State of Mizoram, the State of Mizoram, the State of Mizoram, British India, the Government of India Act, Order of 1937, Assam Frontier Tracts Regulation, the Government of India Act, The Government of India Act, the Government of India Act, District Council, State, the Union of India, the State of Mizoram, the District Council, State, State, the Constituent Assembly's, Schedule 5, the Council of Ministers, Parliament, Union, Parliament, Union, the Apex Court, AIR 1991, Apex Court, Julius, the Apex Court, Parliament, Parliament, the State of Mizoram, the Legislative Assembly of the State, the State of Mizoram, Parliament, the State of Mizoram, the Legislative Assembly of the State of Mizoram, the Legislative Assembly of the State of Mizoram, the State of Mizoram, Desueteude the Apex Court, the State of Mizoram, State

LOC: Mizos, the Scheduled District Act, the Scheduled District Act, the North East Area

CARDINAL: 2, two, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4., 1.4.1912, 5, 6, 6, 7, 3, 8, 9, 1, 2, 1, 437, 3, 1, 354, one, 10, Fifty-third, 11, 12, 3, 13, 14

DATE: the year 1996-96 and, 1996-97, the year 1957, 1996, long 40 years, the year 1872, 1874, 1935, 1974, 1880, 1915, 1935, 2.8.1935, 1971, 1994, 1999, 1986, 1995

PERSON: Mizo, Notification, Scheduled Tribe, Notification, K.P. Pathak, G.K. Joshi, U. Bhuyan, Lushai Hils, Backward Tract, Para 12B, Keshav Chandra Joshi v., Mohan v., Krishnan Kumar Sood, Supp, Dinkar Anna Patil v. State, Cairns, Blackburn, Mizo

GPE: India, Mizoram, Mizoram, Lushai Hills, Lushai Hills, the Lushai Hills District, Lushai Hills District, India, Lushai Hills, Lushai Hills, Lushai Hills, India, Mizoram, Mizoram, Ozford, India, India, Mizoram, Mizoram, India, India, India

WORK_OF_ART: Desueteude the Act, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India

NORP: Central

ORDINAL: 6th, 5th, 5th, 6th

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //