Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. George Williamson (Assam) Ltd.
Decided On : Jul-17-2003
Court : Guwahati
LAW: Section 260A, Section 2(8, Explanation 1 to Rule 2, Section 2 of the Act of 1964, Rule 1 of the First Schedule, Section 2, Section 4, the Companies Act, Section 6 of the Act of 1964, Rule 1 of the Second Schedule, Rule 1, Explanation 1 to Rule 2, Explanation 1 to Rule 2, Rule 1 of the Second Schedule', Rule 1, Explanation 1 to Rule 2, Rule 1, the Explanation 1 to Rule 2, Explanation 1 to Rule 2
NORP: D., Gauhati, Indian
CARDINAL: 1, 1, 2, 5, 1, 2, 2, 5, 8), two hundred thousand, twelve, 392, 393, 394, 2, five, five, five
DATE: 1961, April 4, 2000, 3, 4, 1993, 1964, 1964, 1964, 1964, 1961, the relevant year, the relevant year, 1956, April 4, 2000
ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Commissioner of Surtax (Appeals, the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, Tribunal, capital reserve, the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, Tribunal, the Commissioner of Surtax (Appeals, Sections 391, the Reserve Bank of India, The Commissioner (Appeals, Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner of Surtax, the capital reserve, Tribunal, Sterling Tea Company, Tribunal, the Reserve Bank of India, Tribunal, the Sterling Tea Companies, Tribunal
PERSON: Guwahati Bench, Guwahati, Second Schedule, U. Bhuyan, A.K. Saraf, S.K. Agarwal, George Williamson, ReserveBank, Guwahati Bench, Bhuyan, Shri Bhuyan
GPE: S.T.A. Nos, assessee, India, India
WORK_OF_ART: the Second Schedule, the Second Schedule
MONEY: Ten per cent
ORDINAL: Second, Second, Second
EVENT: the Second Schedule