Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

HesamuddIn @ Iboyaima Vs. State of Manipur and ors.

Decided On : Dec-20-2006

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Section 302/326/114/307/34 IPC, Section 27, the Arms Act

ORG: B.D. Agarwal, the Manipur State Assembly, Th, Pradhan, Federal Party of Manipur, MFP, Manipur Federal Party, MFP, MLA, Government, an Executive Enquiry, Shri K.K. Chhetry, District Magistrate, FIR, MI PS Case No, FIR, the O.C. Mayang Imphal PS, the District Magistrate, MFP, MLA, MFP, MLA, State, FIR, State, Government, Supreme Court, Smt, Nilabati Behera v. State, the Apex Court, State, Counsel, the Gauhati High Court, Rulho v. Union of India and Ors, GA, the Apex Court, Potsangbam Ningol Thokchom, the Gauhati High Court, MBBS, Court, MBBS, J&K, State, the Gauhati High Court, Aheibam O.I. Devi, Potsangbam Ningol Thokchom, Supreme Court, Smt, this High Court, Gauhati High Court, the Gauhati High Court, the Apex Court, High Courts, the Government of Manipur, Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Motor Vehicles Act, the State of Manipur

NORP: J.1

PERSON: Tamijuddin @ Tammi @, Irong Thana Thongkhong, Abdul Salam, MLA, Ibotombi Singh, Gram Panchayat, Tamijuddin @ Tammi, MLA, Tamijuddin, Abdul Salam, MLA, Tamijuddin, MLA, R. Daniel, Shri S. Nepolean, Addl, Addl, Learned Addl, Orissa, Basu v. State, Shri R. Daniel, Dhar Sarma, Shri Nepolean, Addl, Addl, Anr, Mahmud Ali v. Union, D.K. Basu, Rulho, Rulho, Mahmud Ali, Kamini Bala Talukdar, Moheela Moran, Anr

CARDINAL: 03.02.2000, one, 3, three, 11(2)2000, 7.3.2000, 14.11.2000, two, as many as 9, nine, 1997CriLJ743, 6, 3,000, 258, 30.4.2001, 2, 501, 3, 502, 3, 731.7, 1, 3, 4, 380, 1,5, 5, 2, 5, 5, 46,704, 72,000, two, 6, 1.5, 3,000, 1.25, two, 1, 1, 2, 504, 2, 1, 2.5, 2.5, 2.5, Two, fifty thousand, 50,000, 14.9.2000

DATE: that day, 25 years old, 2003, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1998, 18 years, 1997, 27 years old, 2000, 19 years old, the year 1998, more than 60 years old, 1988, a period of, two months, today, two months

TIME: about 5.00 p.m.

GPE: Md., Md., Md., Counsel, Tamijuddin, D.K., Counsel, Tamo Riba v. Union of India, Manipur, case.10, today.16

FAC: Hamilton Bridge, Jagat Dhar Sarma

LOC: Thoubal District, Magisterial

PRODUCT: Aheibam O.I. Devi v. State of

PERCENT: 6 %

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //