Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Smt. Pushpa Kumari Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Decided On : Apr-05-2004

Court : Patna

LAW: Section 131(1)(d, Section 55A, Section 131(1)(d, Section 55A, Section 131(1)(d, Section 75, Section 55A, Section 269L, Section 131(1)(d, Section 75, Rule 9, Section 55A, Section 131(1, Section 75, Section 55A, Section 131(1)(d, Section 131(1)(d

CARDINAL: 1, 9, 2003]262ITR407(SC, 9, 133(6, 133(6, 9, 414, 262, 1 to 8, 9 to 10C, 11, 12, 13, 14, 9, 1, 9, 9, 2, 9

DATE: February 16, 2004, 1961, the assessment year 1982-83, the subsequent year 1983-84, annual

PERSON: Muzaffarpur, Order XXVI, Amiya Bala Paul v. CIT, Order XXVI, Order XXVI, Order XXVI, Order XXVI, Order XXVI, Order XXVI, Order XXVI, Order XXVI

PRODUCT: the 'Act', Rule 10

ORG: Assessing, the Supreme Court, Smt, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Tribunal, the High Court, Assessing, ITR, the State Government, Valuation

GPE: Kolkata, investigations,--In

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //