Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Micro India Ltd.
Decided On : Sep-15-2006
Court : Guwahati
LAW: Section 260A, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, Section 73 of the Act, Section 73 of the Act, Section 143(3, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, the Explanation to Section 28, Section 73 of the Act, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73 of the Act, Section 73 of the Act, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, the Explanation to Section 73, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, Section 73 of the Act, Chapter, Section 72, Section 28, Section 73, Section 73, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, the Explanation to Section 73, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, Section 73, Section 73
PERSON: Katakey, Gauhati Bench, Guwahati, Gauhati Bench, U. Bhuyan, R. Goenka, Bhuyan, Bhuyan, 49,15,930, Bhuyan, Goenka, Goenka, Llearned Counsel, Llearned Counsel
NORP: J.1
DATE: 1961, 1961, 1961, the assessment year 1994-95, year 1994-95, March 1, 1994, year, years, the assessment year, May 29, 2002
ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Explanation, and(i, Explanation, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, above.14
CARDINAL: 2, 2, 1, 2, more than eight
GPE: Counsel
MONEY: 81 per cent, 81 per cent
ORDINAL: first