Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Micro India Ltd.

Decided On : Sep-15-2006

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Section 260A, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, Section 73 of the Act, Section 73 of the Act, Section 143(3, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, the Explanation to Section 28, Section 73 of the Act, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73 of the Act, Section 73 of the Act, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, the Explanation to Section 73, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, Section 73 of the Act, Chapter, Section 72, Section 28, Section 73, Section 73, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, the Explanation to Section 73, the Explanation to Section 73, Section 73, Section 73, Section 73

PERSON: Katakey, Gauhati Bench, Guwahati, Gauhati Bench, U. Bhuyan, R. Goenka, Bhuyan, Bhuyan, 49,15,930, Bhuyan, Goenka, Goenka, Llearned Counsel, Llearned Counsel

NORP: J.1

DATE: 1961, 1961, 1961, the assessment year 1994-95, year 1994-95, March 1, 1994, year, years, the assessment year, May 29, 2002

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Explanation, and(i, Explanation, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, above.14

CARDINAL: 2, 2, 1, 2, more than eight

GPE: Counsel

MONEY: 81 per cent, 81 per cent

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //