Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

P. Mahalingam and Designers Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Decided On : May-19-1998

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

LAW: Section 25, Section 3

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 85.44, two, more than one, two, two, 7, 2, 2, Two, thinner than 44, two, two, thinner than 44, 44, thinner than 50, 22-11-1991.Therefore

DATE: 10-11-1978, 85.44, 85.44, 1404, 85.44, 85.44, 85.44

ORG: the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, First Schedule, Standard Wire Gauge, Department, Commissioner (Appeals, Appeal, M-CUS-220.He, Department, Test house, Bureau of Indian Standards, D.R., the Customs House, Commissioner (Appeals, the Bureau of Indian Standards, Bureau of Indian Standards, Department, Bureau of Indian Standards, Department

GPE: India, valorem, Notification, Notification

PERCENT: 40%

ORDINAL: second, 3rd

WORK_OF_ART: S.W.G.

PERSON: Order

PRODUCT: Consultant

NORP: Indian, Indian

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //