Semantic Analysis by spaCy
P. Mahalingam and Designers Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Decided On : May-19-1998
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
LAW: Section 25, Section 3
CARDINAL: 1, 1, 85.44, two, more than one, two, two, 7, 2, 2, Two, thinner than 44, two, two, thinner than 44, 44, thinner than 50, 22-11-1991.Therefore
DATE: 10-11-1978, 85.44, 85.44, 1404, 85.44, 85.44, 85.44
ORG: the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, First Schedule, Standard Wire Gauge, Department, Commissioner (Appeals, Appeal, M-CUS-220.He, Department, Test house, Bureau of Indian Standards, D.R., the Customs House, Commissioner (Appeals, the Bureau of Indian Standards, Bureau of Indian Standards, Department, Bureau of Indian Standards, Department
GPE: India, valorem, Notification, Notification
PERCENT: 40%
ORDINAL: second, 3rd
WORK_OF_ART: S.W.G.
PERSON: Order
PRODUCT: Consultant
NORP: Indian, Indian