Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Kartar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Decided On : Aug-24-2006
Court : Guwahati
LAW: Indian Electricity Act, Act 9 of 1910, Act 9 of 1910, Section 185, the Electricity Act, Act 36 of, Act 36 of, Section 2(h, Act 9 of 1910, Section 2(c, the Indian Electricity Act 9 of 1910, Section 185 of the Act 36 of, Section 185, Act 2003, Act 9 of 1910, Act 36, Section 2(c, Section 2(38, Section 2(h, Section 14 of the Act, Section 14, Section 2(C, the Indian Electricity Act, Rule 4, Section 2(c, Act 36, Act 36 of
PERSON: A. Hazarika, Licensee, Civil Rule, Civil Rule, B.N. Dutta, S.C. Shyam
NORP: J.1
DATE: 17.3.2005, 2002, 2002, 1910, 1910, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2191, 2191, 2003, 2191, 2003, 2003, 2003, 1910, 2191, 2003, 2003, 2003, 17.3.2005, 2002, 15 days
CARDINAL: 25(SH, 262, 26.5.2003, 22.7.2002, 262, 2002.6, 21.8.2002, 21.8.2002, 2, 2(15, 2(39, 3, 8, 10, 2003:2(15, 22.7.2002.15, 25(SH, 262, 2002.16, 262, 02
WORK_OF_ART: 21.8.2002, Civil Rule No
LOC: Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single
ORG: Military Engineering Service Rules, MES Rules, Court, the Defence Department, Government of India, Meghalaya, the Meghalaya State Electricity Board, the Army Authorities under Military Engineering Service Rules, The Army Authorities, the Writ Petition, the Division Bench, the Writ Petition, the MES Rules, MES, E&M, the MES Rules, MES, Court, Counsel, Central Government Counsel, MES Rules, the MES Rules, The Government of India, MES, Electric Energy, MES, the Review Petitioner, Government, Government, the MES Rules, MES, MES, the Government of India, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, MES, the Writ Appeal and Civil Rule No
FAC: Kiran Line Basti
PRODUCT: Act, the Act 9 of 1910, the Act 9 of 1910, the Act 9 of 1910:2(c, Act